Deficiency Index

Millard County Care and Rehabilitation

Delta, Utah · CCN 465157

12 surveys since 2009, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
105
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2009–2026
’09’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse8

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Millard · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 38 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Utah.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.70
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.86—
Annual nurse turnover36.8%52.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$19,656 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2356.1%E1434.1%F24.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 105 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Millard County Care and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident the facility did not provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. In addition, a resident with pressure ulcers did not receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, a resident had no treatment orders when a new pressure ulcer was identified. The same resident did not have wound measurements of her heel wound since November 2023 and December 2023 for two additional wounds. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, a staff member tested positive for COVID-19 and was not excluded from working in the facility. Findings include: On 2/5/24 upon entering the facility, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the Maintenance Director tested positive for COVID-19 that morning. The Administrator stated he fixed the facility washing machine and then tested positive. The Administrator stated he was not feeling well and he was sent home. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Feb 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist (IP) who are responsible for the facility's infection control program. Findings include: The facility's Infection control documentation was requested. No Infection Control Surveillance Logs were available from the previous survey 5/5/22 to current. On 2/6/24 at 4:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the facility had not had an IP since the previous survey. The DON stated she had not completed the IP training. The DON stated she was unable to fill the IP position because then it would take a nurse from patient care. The DON stated she did not have infection control tracking or trending. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Apr 30, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, it was found that for 4 out of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. Specifically, five residents or resident representatives were not informed of risks and benefits, treatment or treatment alternatives or options in advance of starting psychotropic medications. Resident identifiers: 4, 6, 8, and 54. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Apr 30, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for 3 out of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions and did not ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for anti-psychotic drugs were limited to 14 days. Specifically, the facility did not document a gradual dose reduction attempt of psychotropic medications for two residents prior to January 2026 and one resident had an antipsychotic medication prescribed for more than 14 days. Resident identifiers: 4, 8, and 54. 1. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 105 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2026Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Feb 7, 2024Standard19 findings · 1 harm
  • May 5, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Dec 5, 2019Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Aug 31, 2017Standard21 findings · 4 harm
  • May 10, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Jan 9, 2014—6 findings
  • Aug 16, 2012—7 findings
  • Aug 12, 2010—8 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2009—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction