Mill Run Care Center
Hilliard, Ohio · CCN 366142
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 70
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 66
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION
- County
- Franklin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.16 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.84 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.6% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $59,378 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G38.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2367.6% | E514.7% | F38.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mill Run Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 10, 2025
Based on resident record reviews, observations, interviews, review of service invoices, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and plans of care to meet each resident's individual identified needs. This resulted in Actual harm for one resident (#18) on 03/05/25 at 8:00 A.M. when a power outage occurred in the facility and the generator did not start. Resident #18, who was assessed to have chronic respiratory failure and was dependent on continuous oxygen, was not monitored for respiratory failure during the power outage. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 10, 2025
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to identify and treat one (#40) resident's pressure ulcer on her left trochanter (hip) in a timely manner. This resulted in Actual Harm on 08/27/25 when the facility failed to identify and implement a treatment for Resident #40, who was at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for activities of daily living, when the resident was identified to have developed an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer to the left trochanter (hip). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 27, 2025
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, provide timely interventions, and implement a treatment to an existing pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #40 on 03/20/25 when the facility failed to assess a resident's wound and obtain physician orders for wound treatments resulting in Resident #40 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed) to the right gluteus. This affected one (#40) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 18, 2023
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #8. Actual harm occurred on 11/19/22 when Resident #8, who was at risk for skin breakdown was identified to have a Stage III (full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining or tunneling) pressure ulcer to his sacrum. There was no evidence the facility had adequate interventions in place to prevent the development of the ulcer and to promote healing once the ulcer was identified. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 21, 2022
Based on record review, resident interview, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were aware a resident had a nephrostomy bag when transferring the resident from her wheelchair to bed resulting in the nephrostomy tube being dislodged. This affected one (Resident #58) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters/ nephrostomies. Actual harm occurred to Resident #58 when her nephrostomy tube (a surgically inserted catheter tube inserted into the kidney to drain urine and sutured in place) was pulled out of her right lower back resulting in pain and requiring the resident to be sent to the hospital for reinsertion of the nephrostomy tube. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 70 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2025Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 27, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 4, 2023Standard5 findings
- Jan 18, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 21, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Nov 12, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Oct 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2021Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jan 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2019Standard1 finding
- Sep 25, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Aug 24, 2018Standard6 findings
- Nov 8, 2017Standard2 findings
- Oct 29, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Aug 25, 2016Standard5 findings
- Apr 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 19, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2014—2 findings
- Nov 1, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 28, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction