Meridian Care of Hebbronville
Hebbronville, Texas · CCN 675796
27 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 83
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jim Hogg · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 4, 2026
158 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.35 | 3.40 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.5% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,065 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G110.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D770.0% | E220.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meridian Care of Hebbronville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 4, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 on 05/08/26 from LW who verbally and physically abused Resident #1 when she slapped the resident in the face and called the resident a whore, fucking crazy, and stupid. CNA A failed to intervene and report while the altercation between the LW and Resident #1 occurred. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm, humiliation, and a diminished quality of life. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on05/08/28 and ended on 05/10/26. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Dec 4, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for one of five residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to hold Resident #5's losartan (blood pressure medication) when Resident #5's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on November 6th and 26th of 2025. 2. The facility failed to hold Resident #5's hydralazine (blood pressure medication) when Resident #5's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on November 2nd, 6th, 17th, and 26th of 2025. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Dec 4, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #36) reviewed for documentation. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented relevant information (redness/rash to abdomen) and did not document incorrect information (dependence on staff for eating due to tube feeding) on Resident #13's admission Nursing Assessment form dated 11/26/25. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Dec 4, 2025
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38's call light was within reach at all times while in his room, as stated in the care plan. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services, and the implementation of personalized plan of care developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet dated 12/03/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 05/13/17. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Dec 4, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, physicians orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure LVN A transcribed a physician's telephone order during her shift for oxygen at 2 Lpm as needed to maintain oxygen levels above 90% into PCC for Resident #9. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for insufficient or inappropriate care due to other staff not being aware the physician's order existed. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 83 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 4, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Standard4 findings
- Oct 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Sep 5, 2024Standard3 findings
- Dec 3, 2020Standard1 finding
- Nov 5, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 9, 2019Standard and complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Jul 13, 2017Standard10 findings · 4 harm
- Sep 15, 2016Complaint4 findings
- Jun 9, 2016Standard3 findings
- Apr 29, 2015Standard2 findings
- Sep 17, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Apr 16, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jan 8, 2014—2 findings
- Dec 11, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 6, 2013—8 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—6 findings · 5 harm
- Apr 18, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 3, 2013—5 findings
- Feb 26, 2013—3 findings
- Sep 25, 2012—5 findings · 4 harm
- May 23, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 19, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 16, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 9, 2011—2 findings
- Mar 3, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction