Mercy Hospital Skilled Nursing Facility
Lackawanna, New York · CCN 335308
9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 38
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 84
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Erie
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2025
473 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.68 | 4.13 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.65 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.7% | 43.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mercy Hospital Skilled Nursing Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Jul 24, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 7/24/25, the facility did not ensure: they assessed all residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, they reviewed the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, obtain informed consent prior to installation, or provide documentation that preventive maintenance was conducted for all bed rails for four (4) (Residents #7, 9, 27, and 50) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, the U Rails were loose and not secure (Resident's #27 and #50); lacked evidence of consent and risks verses benefits; and there was no routine preventative maintenance (Resident #7, 9, 27, & 50). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Jul 24, 2025
Based on interview, observation, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 7/24/25, the facility did not ensure that residents have a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one (1) (#30) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, there was a lack of risk versus benefit assessments and informed consents for the alarm; the alarm sounded in the room, and Resident #30 was bothered by the use of the alarm and felt undignified.The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Resident Rights dated 5/20/24 documented that each resident's rights are protected and promoted; that each resident… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Jul 24, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 7/25/25, the facility did not provide services consistent with professional standards of care during medication administration for three (3) (#1, #20, and #77) of seven (7) residents observed. Specifically, Registered Nurse #2 administered medications that they had not personally prepared to Resident #1, #20, and #77. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Medication Administration dated 10/24/24 documented nurses must only administer medications that they have personally prepared. Nurses must remain with the resident until the medication has been taken. The nurse will document administration of each medication in the medication administration record (MAR).1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF757Jul 29, 2022
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey started on 7/25/22 completed 7/29/22, the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used for excessive duration and without adequate indication for its use. Specifically, one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications was treated with an antibiotic for an excessive duration, without adequate indication for its continued use. The finding is: Review of facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Antibiotic Stewardship, effective 10/2017, documented the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) will guide safe, appropriate, effective and responsible use of antibiotic agents. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jul 29, 2022Standard1 finding
- Dec 21, 2018Standard1 finding
- Sep 12, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
- Aug 6, 2015Standard5 findings
- Sep 5, 2014Standard3 findings
- Sep 11, 2013—15 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—3 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Aug 15, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction