Deficiency Index

Memorial Hospital of Gardena D/P SNF

Gardena, California · CCN 555441

18 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
148
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
69
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Los Angeles
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 21 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Apr 10, 2026

213 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day9.054.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.70—
Annual nurse turnover57.1%28.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,831 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2678.8%E618.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 148 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Memorial Hospital of Gardena D/P SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents who were admitted to the facility with intact skin did not develop a pressure ulcer ([PU], injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin or bony prominences) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 163, 40, and 38). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 163's did not develop a Stage III PU (Full thickness tissue loss) to the right buttocks after the admission to the facility. 2. Ensure the nursing staff monitored Resident 163 skin condition to identify development of a PU to the right buttock at the earlier stage to prevent development of a Stage III PU. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Mar 10, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance ([QAA] develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) committee meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement QAPI ([QAPI] a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement) program. 2. Ensure the Infection preventionist (IP) and the Medical Director participated on the facility's QAA/QAPI meeting. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a lack of oversight for infection prevention practices, overall medical care being provided by the facility, and ensuring that resident care policies were implemented appropriately. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 10, 2026

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:Ensure food items in walk-in refrigerator 1 were labeled and unexpired. Ensure the walk-in freezer 2 had an internal thermometer (used to check the refrigerator's inside temperature).Ensure the walk-in refrigerator 3 had an internal temperature that was within range (acceptable is 41 degrees F or lower) .This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents developing a foodborne illness (food poisoning). Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/7/2026 at 8:48 a.m., with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), an unopened cheese danish was observed unlabeled and undated, and a pack of opened hot dog buns had an expiration date of 4/4/2026 in the walk-in refrigerator 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Feb 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 32) received care in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) by failing to: 1. Implement turning interventions for Resident 5. 2. Provide wound care as ordered by the physician for Resident 32. These deficient practice had the potential for the resident to acquire new pressure ulcers and/or worsen current pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's Admission Record, the Admission Record, indicated Resident 5's was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food items were labeled with received and used dates in the dry storage area and two refrigerators. 2. Ensure expired foods were not stored in the kitchen and accessible to be used in food preparation in accordance with food service safety. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:43 a.m. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 148 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 10, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Feb 16, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Jun 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2020Standard11 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Jan 20, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Mar 26, 2018Standard13 findings
  • Apr 17, 2017Standard11 findings
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 8, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 12, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2014Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 27, 2013—6 findings
  • Jul 7, 2012—11 findings
  • Apr 27, 2011—17 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction