Medilodge of Midland
Midand, Michigan · CCN 235284
39 surveys since 2010, 29 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 205
- Surveys
- 39
- Harm or worse
- 29
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 107
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- MEDILODGE
- County
- Midland
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 89 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
May 12, 2026
181 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.85 | 3.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.1% | 47.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D541.7% | E758.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6861×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6891×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Medilodge of Midland, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Aug 26, 2021
This citation pertains to intake # MI00- 1, MI00- 4, MI00- 8, MI00- 7, MI00- 9 This citation has multiple (5) deficiency practice statements (DPS). DPS-A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) provide coordinated care with specialists for a new diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #8), reviewed for quality of care, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when, beginning on 03/18/2020, facility staff did not provide coordinated quality care for R8 causing a delay of administration of treatments and services, and exacerbating the potential irreversible progression of MS This deficient practice resulted in the high likelihood for residents with chronic treatable conditions to be at risk for serious harm, serious injury, and/or death. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 29, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize an acute need for increased supervision and implementation of safety measures for one resident (Resident (R) 27) with escalating confusion and displays of at-risk behaviors, resulting in a fall with injury and the potential for all facility residents who are at risk for falls for delayed response to safety needs. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R27 was originally admitted to the facility 7/21/21 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, and was Legally Blind. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Dec 3, 2021
This citation pertains to intake #MI 255 and #MI 513 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care for 3 residents (Resident #101, Resident #100, and Resident #108) out of 3 residents reviewed, resulting in (1) for Resident #101 (a) delayed wound care, (b) additional facility acquired skin concerns, (c) unmonitored and untreated decreased oxygen saturation, (d) significant drops in blood pressure not reported to the provider, (e) inability to accurately assess for weight gain/loss for a resident with [CONDITION(S)], and (f) unmonitored low blood sugars, (2) for Resident #100 (a) unassessed vomiting, (b) untreated constipation, (c) a decline in the ability to move independently with no access to the call system, and (d) the potential for… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Aug 26, 2021
This citation pertains to intake #MI00- 8 and MI00- 9 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive resident focused care plans based on a comprehensive assessment for 3 residents (Resident #4, Resident #320 and Resident #9), resulting in unidentified care needs and hospitalization as the result of complications from inadequate provision of care according to standards of practice. Findings: Resident #320 (R320) Review of an Admission Record revealed Resident #320 (R320) was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R320 was non-verbal. During an observation on 8/10/21 at 1:30 P.M. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 26, 2021
This citation pertains to intake #MI00- 8 and #MI00- 9 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers and implement treatments and monitoring for pressure ulcer prevention and healing for 3 residents (Resident #320, Resident #9, and Resident #4) resulting in infection, hospitalization and avoidable development and worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident #320 (R320) Review of an Admission Record revealed Resident #320 (R320) was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R320 was non-verbal. Review of a Care Plan Report reflected R320 had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 48 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 48 of 205 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 12, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 7, 2025Standard7 findings
- Sep 11, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jun 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 3, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint7 findings · 5 harm
Show the 31 earlier surveys
- Jul 2, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 21, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2020Standard29 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 13, 2020Complaint2 findings
- May 17, 2019Complaint5 findings
- Mar 7, 2019Standard10 findings
- Apr 17, 2018Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 6, 2018Standard30 findings · 5 harm
- Mar 2, 2017Standard11 findings
- Jan 27, 2016Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 17, 2014Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 10, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 14, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 30, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Jan 14, 2014—1 finding
- Dec 13, 2013—6 findings
- Jun 12, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 5, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 18, 2013—11 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—5 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 11, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 24, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 11, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 1, 2011—9 findings
- Mar 31, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 29, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction