Medford Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Medford, Massachusetts · CCN 225339
30 surveys since 2010, 22 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 213
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 22
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 142
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Middlesex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Aug 1, 2025
465 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.42 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.0% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G38.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2567.6% | E924.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6042×
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Medford Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF658Jul 5, 2022
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to 1. ensure that emergency medical care was provided in accordance with the resident's wishes and accepted standards of professional nursing practice for 1 Resident (#193) out of a total of 36 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Nurse #1 followed professional standard of practice by failing to abide by its policy by A) failing to delegate the announcement of the Code Blue (medical emergency) to CNA #1 B) failing to initiate CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) immediately in accordance with Resident #193's wishes and C) failing to follow the facility policy regarding use of a back board and transferred the Resident from the bed to the floor before initiating CPR. 2. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Jul 5, 2022
Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Response Team, dated ,d+[DATE], indicates the following: Policy: The facility will have an Emergency Response Team (Nurse) available on each shift of every day to immediately respond to all Code Blue (medical emergency) situations prior to the arrival of emergency personnel. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) will be performed on those residents whom are found to be unresponsive, without a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in place and are determined to not be clinically dead. Nursing staff certified CPR providers will perform CPR under those circumstances. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF655May 25, 2023
Based on record review and staff interviews, for one Resident (#22) of 28 sampled residents , the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for him/her, resulting in a fall, requiring nine stitches to his/her right ear. Findings include: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnosis including dementia, and depression. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that he/she is severely cognitively impaired and requires extensive 1-person physical assist with ambulation, transfer, bed mobility and toilet use. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684May 25, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure standards of quality of care for 2 Residents (#18 and #44), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, 1). for Resident #18 the colonoscopy preparation instructions were not followed, resulting in the procedure not occurring as planned and Resident #18 requiring hospitalization for dehydration and 2). for Resident #44 A. to ensure daily treatment to his/her right second toe was provided in accordance with the physician's orders, resulting in failure to monitor the wound for changes, pain, signs and symptoms of infection. Further, the treatment that was provided included a dressing which was not indicated by the physician's order potentially resulting in keeping the area moist and not dry. B. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 25, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed ensure residents identified as being at risk for falls received adequate supervision and revision of care plan interventions as needed to prevent falls, resulting in falls with injury for 2 Residents (#125 and #88) out of a total of 28 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Fall Prevention policy, revised 11/21/21 indicated: Policy: A fall prevention plan will be initiated on all Residents who are at risk for falling. Each Resident will be assessed for risk factors and predisposition. Process: 2. A fall risk assessment will be completed and Residents scoring at risk for falls will have the following interventions. 3. […]
Read 42 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 42 of 213 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 1, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jul 12, 2024Standard13 findings
- May 25, 2023Standard16 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 16, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 12, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Jul 5, 2022Standard20 findings · 3 harm
- Feb 3, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Oct 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Oct 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 27, 2021Standard30 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Jul 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 24, 2019Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 12, 2018Standard13 findings
- Oct 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 25, 2017Standard10 findings
- Jun 8, 2016Standard9 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 26, 2015Standard9 findings
- Dec 16, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Oct 9, 2014Standard3 findings
- Oct 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 27, 2013—7 findings
- Apr 1, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 4, 2013Standard7 findings · 4 harm
- Dec 21, 2012Standard38 findings · 7 harm
- Nov 30, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 26, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 14, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction