Meadville Medical CTR Tcu
Meadville, Pennsylvania · CCN 395894
10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 19
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 32
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Crawford · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 21, 2025
353 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 10.84 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 3.68 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $7,172 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D342.9% | E114.3% | F114.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C228.6% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meadville Medical CTR Tcu, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF655Nov 21, 2025
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for eight of eight residents reviewed (Residents R9, R24, R25, R26, R28, R31, R35 and R37). Findings include: No facility policy was provided that included a written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative in a language that the resident/resident representative can understand, including a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services and treatments to be administered. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 14, 2023
Based on review of manufacturer's guidelines, facility records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe storage of ice for residents for one of one ice machines located in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for the Kold-Draft GT & GB Models (ice machine) revealed that Individual drains must never be directly connected to a common manifold, drain, or standpipe. If individual drains are to be discharged into a common manifold, drain, or standpipe, a minimum one and half-inch air gap must be provided at each connection. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Nov 21, 2025
Based on observation, review of drug manufacturer instructions, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately date and store medications in one of two nursing medication rooms (Med Room One). Findings include: Observation on 11/18/2025, at 1:20 p.m. in Med Room One, revealed three opened vials of Purified Protein Derivative (PPD-a skin testing agent for tuberculosis) without an open date marked on the vials. A review of the drug manufacturer leaflet indicated a vial of Tubersol which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. At the time of the observation, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the PPD vials were opened, undated and not dated to indicate when the medication should be discarded. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Nov 15, 2024
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an incident with injury in a timely manner for one of 10 residents reviewed (Residents R78). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Abuse Policy of the Transitional Care Unit dated 11/08/2024, revealed that, all investigations shall be comprehensive and responsive and shall occur promptly after notification of an alleged abuse . Review of facility policy entitled Accidents and Incident Reports dated 11/08/24, revealed a written report shall be made of any accident or incident in which a resident is involved in the facility . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF727Dec 14, 2023
Based on review of position description and job duties and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse was employed as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis since October 26, 2023. Findings include: Review of the position description section for the Director of Nursing - (DON) revealed that the role of the DON includes to coordinate total nursing care for residents using nursing standards and the nursing process in accordance with current Federal, State, and Local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern the Long Tern Care Facility to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 21, 2025Standard4 findings
- Nov 15, 2024Standard1 finding
- Dec 14, 2023Standard2 findings
- Aug 2, 2018Standard1 finding
- Sep 1, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 31, 2016Standard4 findings
- Sep 2, 2015Standard1 finding
- Aug 29, 2014Standard1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Oct 9, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 29, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction