Meadowview Nursing Center
Pell City, Alabama · CCN 015400
11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 59
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- TRINITY MANAGEMENT, INC.
- County
- St. Clair
- Medicare-certified since
- 1988
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 21, 2023
1,237 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 3.90 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.67 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.6% | 46.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D685.7% | E— | F114.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meadowview Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 15, 2021
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The sanitation concerns had the potential to affect all 56 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Food and Nutrition Services Sanitation, dated 10/17, documented The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies and other insects. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Jun 21, 2023
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy titled Administrative Abuse, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #155 was not verbally abused by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 on 01/13/2023. This deficient practice affected one (Resident #155) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The facility implemented corrective actions to correct the identified deficient practice on 01/20/2023; thus, past noncompliance was cited. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Administrative Abuse, revised October 2017, revealed, . Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . exploitation . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Jun 21, 2023
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy titled Administrative Abuse, and review of the facility's investigation file, the facility failed to implement two (protection and investigation) of seven components of their abuse policy when Resident #155 was verbally abused by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 on 01/13/2023. Specifically, the facility failed to interview CNA #20 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, who had knowledge of the incident. Further, the facility failed to ensure CNA #2, who witnessed the verbal abuse did not leave Resident #155 alone, unattended with the alleged perpetrator, CNA #1, while she reported the allegation of abuse to the nurse. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Jun 21, 2023
Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to transcribe physician's orders into the medical record for one (Resident #105) of 27 sampled residents Findings included: A review of the facility's standing orders signed by the Medical Director, Administrator, and Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/07/2022, indicated . The following orders have been approved by our staff physicians and nursing supervisors. The physician's signatures appear at the conclusion of these orders. The treatments or medications may be administered by the LPN [licensed practical nurse] or RN [registered nurse] and may be used an indefinite number of times unless stated otherwise. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Apr 15, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications were removed from the supply on one (1) of two (2) medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nursing Medications/Administrating, dated 5/13 with revision date of 7/14, revealed that before administering medication, staff should verify the expiration date. During observation of the front hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 4/14/21 at 10:20 a.m., revealed one (1) bottle of Aspirin (ASA) 81 milligrams (mg), was opened on 7/15/2020 and expired on 1/21. Continued observation revealed a Cranberry Supplement 450 mg opened on 3/20/21; however, had a best buy date of 6/2020. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 21, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Standard4 findings
- Feb 28, 2019Standard2 findings
- Mar 29, 2018Standard4 findings
- Feb 16, 2017Standard5 findings
- Feb 11, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jan 15, 2015Standard7 findings
- Feb 27, 2014Standard4 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Mar 28, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 19, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 17, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction