Meadows of Ottawa the
Ottawa, Ohio · CCN 366423
12 surveys since 2016. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 86
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Putnam · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Jan 30, 2025
648 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.20 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.75 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.2% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2284.6% | E13.8% | F27.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F7602×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meadows of Ottawa the, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jan 30, 2025
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, interview with wound care nurse practitioner, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound monitoring and physician prescribed wound treatments were administered as ordered. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #71 fell from his wheelchair and sustained a laceration to the head which compromised a preexisting head wound. Resident #71 was evaluated at the hospital and returned to the facility with a hemostatic bandage dressing in place. The dressing remained in place for seven days without being changed or evaluated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 31, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene when handling ready-to-eat foods. This affected three (Residents #9 #128, #6) of three residents observed for meal preparation. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observations on 10/23/23 beginning at 8:27 A.M. in the freezer revealed a box of chicken nuggets open to air, a plastic tub labeled taco meat with the lid off, and a torn open bag of breaded fish filets. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 30, 2021
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in refrigerator was clean, failed to use safe food handling techniques when touching ready to eat meat with bare hands, and facility failed to distribute meals in a sanitary manner. This affected 11 (#10, #12, #17, #19, #20 #21, #22, #27, #28, #40, and #43) residents who received pureed or mechanically soft food, affected two residents (#11 an #54) and had the possibility to affect 18 residents who received lunch meals in their rooms, and affected all 64 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified two resident (Resident #31 and #49) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Oct 31, 2023
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meat was palatable. This affected four residents (#6, #30, #38 and #68) and had the potential to affect all residents on a regular diet. The facility identified 23 residents were not on a regular diet (#4, #7, #11, #12, #14, #15, #16, #19, #22, #24, #26, #31, #34, #40, #48, #53, #61, #64, #71, #72, #128, #228, and #229). The facility census was 80. Findings include: Observations on 10/23/23 beginning at 12:03 P.M. in the main dining room during the noon meal revealed the main meal provided was chopped steak with mushroom gravy, red skin mashed potatoes, and vegetable medley. Observation on 10/23/23 at 12:05 P.M. in the restorative dining room revealed Resident #6 was eating her lunch unassisted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Jan 30, 2025
Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) care received adequate assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#59) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, injury to sacral spinal cord, other front temporal neurocognitive disorder, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 was rarely understood and dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 30, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2023Standard12 findings
- Jul 30, 2021Standard7 findings
- Nov 12, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 4, 2019Standard4 findings
- May 3, 2018Standard6 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Mar 23, 2017Standard3 findings
- Apr 1, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Mar 9, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 17, 2016Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction