Meadows of Leipsic

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Meadows of Leipsic, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 22, 2026

  Based on review of facility's Legionella plan and documentation, staff interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective infection control/water management plan to prevent the risk of Legionella. This had the possible affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Plan, updated 08/04/25, revealed Legionella could grow and spread in common areas including sinks, showers, water fountains, standing water on washing tables, spa tub and ice machines. There were no records of flushing of low-flow or dead-leg pipes by the facility. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 1, 2023

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were provided beard protectors while working in the kitchen. This affected all 39 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Observation on 05/30/23 at 8:27 A.M. revealed Cook #205 had a full beard and mustache approximately one inch long and was working in the kitchen. The Cook was not wearing a beard protector. Interview with Cook #205 on 05/30/23 at 8:32 A.M. verified that he did not wear a beard protector while working as they were not provided for staff. Interview with the Director of Food Services on 05/30/23 at 8:35 A.M. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 3, 2021

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate signage was placed on the door of one Resident (#20) in quarantine status, and failed to ensure one Resident (#13) remained in quarantine status. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. The resident had a hospital stay from 04/17/21 through 04/24/21. Observation on 04/26/21 at 11:59 A.M. revealed there was no sign on the resident's door to indicate transmission-based precautions. Interview on 04/26/21 at 12:05 P.M. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Jan 22, 2026

  Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident requests for bed accommodations were honored. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 44. Findings Include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included fracture of right femur (subsequent encounter) with orthopedic surgery, type I diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, anxiety disorder, chronic pain, and muscle weakness.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Resident #4 was independent with toilet use, bed mobility, transfer, and required set up assistance with bathing. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jan 22, 2026

  Based on medical review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's bed sheets were clean and sanitary. This affected one (Resident #50) of 21 residents reviewed for clean and homelike environment. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis, dementia, and obstructive and reflux uropathy,The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had impaired cognition. Resident #50 was dependent with toileting. Observation on 01/22/26 at 10:07 A.M. of catheter care revealed Resident #50 had a bowel movement at the start of catheter care. […]