Deficiency Index

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing

Salt Lake City, Utah · CCN 465158

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
117
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
41
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
CASCADES HEALTHCARE
County
Salt Lake
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 38 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Utah.

Last survey on record

Nov 20, 2025

354 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.813.70
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.44—
Annual nurse turnover77.8%52.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$31,331 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ23.4%K—L—
Actual harmG58.5%H11.7%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2644.1%E2440.7%F11.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 59 of the 117 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 22, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 10 out of 40 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was transported via the facility van and the wheelchair was not secured properly inside the vehicle which resulted in the resident falling backwards causing hyperextension of his neck. The resident was diagnosed with central cord syndrome and edema at the level of C6 and C7 of his cervical spine. Upon return to the facility the resident's cervical collar was removed by Certified Nursing Assistant(s) (CNA) during grooming and bathing cares. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF726Feb 22, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, a resident was transported via the facility van and the wheelchair was not secured properly inside the vehicle which resulted in the resident falling backwards causing hyperextension of his neck. The resident was diagnosed with central cord syndrome and edema at the level of C6 and C7 of his cervical spine. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF867Feb 22, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and implement written policies and procedures for feedback, data collections systems, and monitoring, including adverse event monitoring. Specifically, multiple areas of immediate jeopardy and harm were identified on the recertification survey. Resident identifiers: 3, 6, 17, 19, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 39, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, and 97. Findings include: 1. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 10 out of 40 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF578Feb 22, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 40 sampled residents had the right to refuse medical treatment and formulate an advance directive. Specifically, one resident with an advanced health care directive received treatment that was documented as against the resident's wishes. This resulted in a finding of harm. Resident identifier: 39. Findings include: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, interstitial pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, severe protein calorie malnutrition, pulmonary fibrosis, endocarditis, transient ischemic attack, end stage heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, abnormal weight loss, delirium, benign prostatic hypertension,… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF624Feb 22, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide and document sufficient preparation to 2 of 40 sampled residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. Specifically, one resident with cognitive impairment was discharged to a hotel room, but was subsequently seen at a local emergency room after becoming lost. This resulted in a finding of harm. In addition, one resident left on a leave of absence, and was not oriented for discharge upon return to the facility. Resident identifiers: 94 and 97. Findings include: HARM 1. Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Wernicke's encephalopathy, dementia, major depressive disorder, other amnesia, and history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 117 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 20, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Oct 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard and complaint42 findings · 9 harm
  • May 25, 2022Standard4 findings
  • May 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 29, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Oct 25, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • May 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Nov 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Aug 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2014Standard1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 19, 2013—6 findings
  • Dec 21, 2011—9 findings
  • Mar 11, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction