Deficiency Index

McCoy Memorial Nursing Center

Bishopville, South Carolina · CCN 425174

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
65
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CARLYLE SENIOR CARE
County
Lee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 30, 2026

102 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.503.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover28.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,512 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG111.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD444.4%E222.2%F222.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 65 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at McCoy Memorial Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 5, 2024

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to protect Resident (R)3) from accident hazards in the resident's environment specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 failed to engage the wheel locks on a shower chair, causing R3 to sustain a fall with major injuries. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program last revised 09/01/23, states, Each resident . will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimalize the likelihood of falls. Review of R3's Face Sheet revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: Alzheimer's, dementia, and osteoarthritis. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Jan 19, 2022

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, MD Notification, the facility failed to notify the attending physician of a necrotic decubitus pressure ulcer, acquired in the facility, to ensure orders for treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility's failure constituted harm, past non-compliance. Cross Refer: F600, F686, F842 Findings include: The facility admitted R1 on 7/12/21 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the medical record on 10/12/21 at approximately 12:00 Noon, revealed a Comprehensive Plan of Care which included, a stage 1 pressure ulcer to the left hip that resolved on 7/22/21 and a stage 2 decubitus to the sacrum that resolved on 7/22/21. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 19, 2022

    Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 received care and services needed to prevent the development of a large necrotic pressure ulcer requiring a hospital stay for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers. The facility's failure constituted harm at past non-compliance. Cross Refer: F580, F686, F842 Findings include: The facility admitted R1 on 7/12/21 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of R1's medical record revealed he weighed 115 pounds (lbs) and was 72 inches tall on admission. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 19, 2022

    Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Body Audit Policy, and Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines, and Pressure Ulcer Surveillance, the facility failed to ensure body audits were completed, and a large necrotic pressure ulcer was prevented and treated prior to requiring hospitalization for elevated temperature and slow responsiveness for Resident (R)1 for 1 of 5 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers. The facility's failure constituted harm, past-noncompliance. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF842Jan 19, 2022

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the the facility policy titled, Body Audit Policy, and Pressure Ulcer Surveillance, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate records related to body audits, assessments, measurements and documentation of a pressure ulcer that was described as large and necrotic for Resident (R)1 for 1 of 5 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers. The facility's failure constituted harm, past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility admitted R1 on 7/12/21 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 65 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Jul 24, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2022Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Oct 12, 2021Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Aug 20, 2020Standard1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Oct 11, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard15 findings
  • Feb 25, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Oct 31, 2012—8 findings
  • Nov 16, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction