Deficiency Index

Massachusetts Veterans Home at Holyoke

Holyoke, Massachusetts · CCN 225786

2 surveys since 2025, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
9
Surveys
2
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2025–2026
’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file1/2

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
128
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Hampden
Medicare-certified since
2025

CMS ratings

Overall
—
Health inspection
—
Staffing
—
Quality measures
—

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 28, 2025

619 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day8.217.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.55—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E233.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 9 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Massachusetts Veterans Home at Holyoke, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF700Jun 9, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments which included review of risks including entrapment, were completed as required for six Residents (#62, #40, #4, #10, #3, and #81) of six applicable residents reviewed for bed rails use, and informed consent obtained for the use of bed rails for two Residents (#10 and #4), of the six applicable residents, out of a total sample of 27 residents, in addition to completing bed rail assessment for any resident using bed rails after September 2024. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Feb 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility residents and resident representatives were informed on how to file a grievance and that grievance forms were readily accessible and/or available on eight Units (One North, Two North, Two East, Two South, Three East, Four East, Three [NAME] and Three North) out of ten units observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievance Policy, revised March 2021, indicated the following in part: -All veterans residing at the Soldiers Home in [NAME], their families and veteran representatives may voice a complaint or grievance. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF948Feb 28, 2025

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individuals who were utilized as paid feeding assistants, completed a State-approved training program. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the program utilized by the facility to train Activities Staff was approved by the State of Massachusetts, as required. Findings include: During the entrance conference interview on 2/25/25 at 7:44 A.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said that the facility did not utilize paid feeding assistants. On 2/25/25 from 11:18 A.M. through 12:18 P.M., during a lunch meal observation on the Two North Unit, the surveyor observed Activities Assistant (AA) #1 assist in feeding some of the residents in the Unit Dining Room. On 2/27/25 from 11:26 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF921Jun 9, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional environment associated with following the manufacturer's guidelines for maintaining mechanical lift slings for three Residents (#49, #59, and #67) out of a total sample of 27 residents, who required the use of mechanical lift slings for transfers. Specifically, for Resident's #49, #59, and #67, the facility failed to ensure that mechanical lift slings were air dried after laundering, when facility staff did not follow the manufacturer instructions not to tumble dry and used the facility dryer to dry the mechanical lift slings, placing the residents at risk for the use of improper fitting slings shrunk by the dryer and associated discomfort and pain with sling use.Findings include:Review of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Feb 28, 2025

    2. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and resided on the Two North Unit. Review of the Nutrition Care Plan, initiated 12/23/24, indicated Resident #53 was at nutrition/hydration risk related to Alzheimer's Disease and included the following interventions: -provide Pureed Diet with thin liquids (double portions) -Resident has slow swallow reflex, take time feeding him/her and allow the Resident to finish swallowing before continuing to feed him/her. -Takes thin liquids well, give small sips at a time. Review of the ADL Fact Sheet (utilized by the CNAs to indicate the Resident's specific care needs), printed on 2/28/25, indicated the following: -required total staff assistance with feeding On 2/25/25, from 11:18 A.M. […]

Read all 9 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 9, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Feb 28, 2025Standard6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction