Masconomet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Topsfield, Massachusetts · CCN 225750
20 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 123
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ATLAS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Mar 12, 2026
242 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.68 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.8% | 40.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1184.6% | E17.7% | F17.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5681×
Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
- F6581×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6891×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Masconomet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 12, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and handle food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, potentially putting the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure that food was stored, labeled, and dated properly, and that food/beverages were not expired; and2. Ensure staff did not handle ready-to-eat food with contaminated gloves. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated November 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following:-All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled and dated ( use by date).-Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their use by date, frozen, or… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF758Mar 20, 2025
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) ordered psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for four Residents (#32, #85, #421 and #424) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #32, the facility failed to implement a 14 day stop date for a PRN Ativan (an antianxiety medication). 2. For Resident #85, the facility failed to implement a 14 day stop date for a PRN Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication). 3. For Resident #421, the facility failed to implement a 14 day stop date for a PRN Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication). 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 6, 2022
Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to 1. ensure it followed Center for Disease Control (CDC) requirements for assessing in-person visitation for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and exposure to others with suspected or confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2 infection, 2. perform proper hand hygiene, 3. maintain social distancing between residents during an outbreak, 4. practice proper glove use when administering insulin, and 5. wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a COVID positive room. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Mar 12, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#91) hand roll was in place as ordered by the physician, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include:Review of the policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated as revised July 2017, indicated:2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM (range of motion). 6. Interventions may include therapies, the provision of necessary equipment, and/or exercises and will be based on professional standards of practice and will be consistent with state laws and practice acts. 8. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Mar 12, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, for one Resident (#77), out of 26 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accidents and hazards to prevent injury. Specifically, for Resident #77, who has a history of repeated falls, the facility failed to ensure fall mats were in place as ordered by the physician. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated as revised March 2018, indicated:Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk.1. The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 12, 2026Standard6 findings
- Mar 20, 2025Standard6 findings
- Apr 11, 2024Standard1 finding
- Apr 7, 2023Standard4 findings
- Jan 6, 2022Standard6 findings
- Sep 21, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 5, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Jul 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 3, 2019Standard5 findings
- Dec 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 4, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jan 28, 2016Standard5 findings
- May 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 20, 2014Standard1 finding
- Aug 20, 2013—5 findings
- Sep 19, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 11, 2011—2 findings
- Mar 25, 2011—3 findings · 3 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Nemasket Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterMiddleboroughno harm findings
- Aberjona Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterWinchester2 harm findings
- Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation CenterFramingham1 harm finding
- Port Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNewburyport1 harm finding
- Royal Nursing Center, LLCFalmouth1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction