Deficiency Index

Maryhill Manor

Niagara, Wisconsin · CCN 525467

28 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Marinette · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jun 16, 2026

146 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.864.48
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.96—
Annual nurse turnover45.3%49.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$50,606 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.6%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1372.2%E—F422.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Maryhill Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 25, 2024

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free from abuse for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R4) of 5 sampled residents. R2 reported to Activity Aide (AA)-D on 6/6/24 that R1 had touched R2's breast in the hallway that morning. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B reviewed camera footage on 6/6/24, interviewed both residents, and determined the allegation did not occur. Monitoring interventions were not implemented for R1. On 6/7/24, Social Services Director (SSD)-C informed NHA-A and DON-B that SSD-C had seen R1 and R2 in the lounge after lunch on 6/6/24. NHA-A and DON-B again reviewed camera footage and determined R1 had touched R2 inappropriately on 6/6/24 at approximately 1:04 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 25, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not test the temperature of the sanitizing solution used in sanitizing buckets and the 3-compartment sink per manufacturer's recommendations. In addition, the facility did not monitor parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution. The facility did not consistently label resident food with use-by dates and ensure timely disposal of expired items. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. The practice had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not monitor and document food cooling temperatures. Staff did not serve food in a manner that protected residents from cross-contamination. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene and safe food handling practices when serving food. Findings include: On 11/5/24 Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility followed the Wisconsin Food Code. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Sep 27, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure menu serving sizes for regular and pureed diets were followed for 42 of 42 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not follow menu serving sizes to ensure the nutritional needs of residents were met. Findings include: The facility's Food Preparation Guidelines policy, last revised on 8/1/23, included the following: .1. The cook, or designee, shall prepare menu items following the facility's written menus and standardized recipes . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 27, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 42 of 42 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure time/temperature control foods were labeled with open or use-by dates. Residents' food in snack/nourishment refrigerators did not contain expiration dates to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. Staff did not wear hair restraints consistently throughout the kitchen. Findings include: On [DATE], Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code as their standard of practice. 1. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Feb 4, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jun 25, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 27, 2023Standard4 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Aug 31, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Jan 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 14, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Nov 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jul 7, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 14, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Jan 16, 2014—6 findings
  • Oct 31, 2013—3 findings
  • Apr 23, 2013—3 findings
  • Feb 21, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2012—8 findings
  • Feb 27, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 7, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction