Marshall Manor West
Marshall, Texas · CCN 455879
23 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 84
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Harrison
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Feb 4, 2026
278 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.56 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.8% | 48.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,995 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1754.8% | E722.6% | F516.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Marshall Manor West, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers. (Residents #1)The facility failed to keep Resident #1 free from injury after he was improperly transferred by CNA A on 10/19/25 causing extensive bruising to his chest and multiple rib fractures.This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/21/25 at 11:35 a.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF690Feb 4, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. (Resident #9) -Resident #9 had a urinalysis specimen obtained on 01/30/26 due to complaint of discomfort from lower abdomen to his penis and cloudy urine. The facility staff did not follow up on obtaining results and Resident #9 continued with signs of a possible UTI. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the required level of care and possible sepsis. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 02/04/26 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 4, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: The facility failed to ensure the fryer was clean and free of debris.The facility failed to ensure baking sheets did not have brown and black colored buildup and debris of particles on the outside.The facility did not ensure skillets did not have brown and black colored buildup on the inside and outside.The facility failed to ensure a pack of cigarettes, and a fly swatter was not stored under the cutting boards touching the oven mittens.The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the floor in the kitchen prep area.The facility failed to ensure dietary… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Feb 4, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of roaches in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life.The findings included: During an observation of the facility's kitchen on 02/02/2026 at 11:16 a.m., During lunch meal prep there was approximately one dime size light brown roach crawling from the stove area to where pan sheets were stored in the kitchen. During an observation on 02/03/2026 at 11:00 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Nov 6, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for the lunch meal on 11/04/24 and 11/05/24 for 2 of 2 meals (the lunch service) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility did not serve fried chicken, as planned, with the lunch meal on 10/04/2024 nor informed residents that a substitute would be used. The facility failed to serve Salisbury steak with the lunch meal on 10/05/2024 nor informed residents that a substitute would be used. These failures could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 84 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 4, 2026Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 22, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 6, 2024Standard8 findings
- Jul 31, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Sep 27, 2023Standard6 findings
- Aug 24, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jun 16, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- May 16, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jan 16, 2020Standard2 findings
- Feb 6, 2019Standard1 finding
- Mar 29, 2018Standard3 findings
- May 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Feb 15, 2017Standard3 findings
- Nov 18, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Aug 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 27, 2016Standard2 findings
- Feb 4, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jan 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 16, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 27, 2013—3 findings
- May 9, 2012—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction