Marshall Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Marshall, Texas · CCN 455646
22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 79
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 179
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Harrison
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 70 government-run facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.85 | 3.23 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.1% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2779.4% | E720.6% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Marshall Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF607Aug 1, 2022
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #6) The facility failed to immediately remove Resident #6 from the situation when her private sitter was physically and verbally abusing her. This failure could place residents at risk for physical abuse, mental abuse, and emotional abuse, and harm. This was determined to be past non compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non compliance prior to the beginning of the survey. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year old female who admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 29, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 22 resident rooms. (Residents # 56, #95, #103) 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #56 with intact window coverings with no broken/damaged areas. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #95 with a safe toilet that had an appropriate lid on the tank of the toilet. 3. The facility failed to maintain a leaking air vent affecting Resident #103. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsafe, unsanitary, uncomfortable environment, embarrassment due to rooms not appearing homelike, and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688May 7, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with limited range of motion appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #38 and Resident #65) 1. The facility failed to provide restorative therapy for limited range of motion for Resident #38 as recommended by occupation therapy on 04/22/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65 wore a left upper extremity splint (is a medical device that stabilizes a part of your body and holds it in place) per the facility's range of motion/contracture (is a permanent shortening or stiffening of a muscle, tendon, or joint, leading to a loss of mobility and range of… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 7, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 19 residents (Resident # 81 and Resident #89) and 1 of 1 Laundry room reviewed for infection control practices. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA O changed her gloves or sanitized her hands after performing incontinent care and applying a clean brief for Resident #81. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Apr 10, 2024
ased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident# 13, Resident #47, Resident #73) 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #13 and Resident #47's use of a transfer bar. 2. The facility failed to implement Resident #73's care plan intervention to wear a seizure safety helmet while out of bed on 04/09/24. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and cause residents not to receive needed services. Findings included: 1. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 79 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2026Standard8 findings
- Jun 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 7, 2025Standard8 findings
- Apr 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2024Standard5 findings
- Mar 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 24, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
- Aug 1, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Dec 8, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jul 7, 2021Standard2 findings
- Feb 26, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Aug 2, 2019Standard10 findings · 8 harm
- Jul 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 28, 2018Standard1 finding
- May 17, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jun 9, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jul 15, 2015Standard5 findings
- Feb 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 24, 2014Standard3 findings
- Aug 21, 2013—2 findings
- Jul 25, 2012—4 findings
- Sep 21, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction