Deficiency Index

Markesan Resident Home

Markesan, Wisconsin · CCN 525550

8 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
33
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Green Lake · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 12, 2025

635 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.204.48
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.05—
Annual nurse turnover37.3%49.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD250.0%E250.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 33 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Markesan Resident Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 2, 2022

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner, which had the potential to affect all 33 residents (R) at the facility. Staff did not complete proper hand hygiene when moving from working with dirty dishes to clean dishes. Staff did not properly heat food in the microwave that was served to residents. 9 items in dry storage were either past the use by date or past the manufacturer best by date. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:57 AM, Surveyor began the initial kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM-C). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Feb 12, 2025

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a written transfer notice was provided for 4 residents (R) (R188, R20, R25, and R2) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization . In addition, the facility did not ensure the Ombudsman was notified of hospital transfers for 3 (R20, R25, R2) of 4 residents. R188 was transferred to the hospital on 2/10/25. The facility did not provide R188 or R188's representative with a written transfer notice. R20 was transferred to the hospital on 1/10/25. The facility did not provide R20 or R20's representative with a written transfer notice and did not notify the Ombudsman of R20's transfer. R25 was transferred to the hospital on 11/9/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 12, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 38 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not monitor and document food cooling temperatures. Staff did not follow safe reheating protocols for food meant for resident consumption. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 8:50 AM, Surveyor began an initial kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM)-F who indicated the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 3-402.12 Records, Creation and Retention: Records must be maintained to verify that the critical limits required for food safety are being met. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Feb 12, 2025

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 3 of 8 facility and contracted staff reviewed for caregiver background checks. The facility did not ensure thorough and timely caregiver background checks were completed for Physical Therapist (PT)-C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D, and CNA-E. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 12/2019 indicates: The objective of the abuse policy is to comply with the seven-step approach to abuse and neglect detection and prevention .screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting, and response .A. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Feb 12, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R140) of 1 sampled resident received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). On 2/11/25, R140's uncovered catheter drainage bag was observed on the floor next to R140's recliner. Findings include: The facility's Catheter Care and Drainage Bag Covers policy, revised 3/12/21, indicates: .1. Minimize the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and related problems .It is the policy of the facility to cover catheter drainage bags at all times to provide privacy and dignity to the resident . From 2/10/25 to 2/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R140's medical record. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 33 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 12, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Nov 2, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Oct 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2017Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 21, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jun 27, 2012—5 findings
  • Jun 10, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction