Maple Springs Senior Living

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Maple Springs Senior Living, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 25, 2026

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 2 out of 39 sampled residents, a resident was not secured in the facility van and tipped backwards sustaining a closed head injury. This example was cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 73. Findings included: Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/21/25 with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diastolic heart failure, and anxiety. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF805Dec 8, 2025

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 5 sampled residents, that the facility failed to provide each resident with a safe diet that met the special dietary needs of each resident. Specifically, a resident had a diet order for moist and minced texture and was given a cheese stick and pretzels for a snack which resulted in the resident choking and passing away. Resident identifier: 1It was determined the provider's noncompliance with this rule caused harm. However, based on the facility's corrective actions and a review of its current compliance, the deficiency was determined to be past noncompliance. The facility developed and implemented a corrective action plan before the survey start date. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 25, 2026

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator and freezer were undated, and sanitizer buckets did not meet the required sanitation testing levels. Findings included: 1. On 2/23/26 at 8:25 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. The Dietary Manager (DM) was behind the preparation table and was not wearing a hairnet. b. An opened and undated bag of whipped topping was in the refrigerator. c. A pan of meatballs was undated in the refrigerator. d. A bag of frozen rolls were opened and undated in the freezer. e. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 13, 2022

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, an unvaccinated newly admitted resident on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) did not isolate in their room for 14 days after admission and was allowed to exit the droplet isolation room to attend therapy services in the facility gym. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF622Nov 16, 2023

  Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that when the facility transferred or discharged a resident that the information provided to the receiving provided included: contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information including contact information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care; all other necessary information, including a copy of the resident's discharge summary; and any other documentation to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. […]