Deficiency Index

Manhattan Community Care Center

Jackson, Mississippi · CCN 255115

25 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
78
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
180
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
COMMCARE CORPORATION
County
Lee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 17 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Mississippi.

Last survey on record

May 12, 2026

181 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.783.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.13—
Annual nurse turnover56.4%47.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$17,901 across 3 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.1%K—L—
Actual harmG26.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2268.8%E515.6%F26.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 78 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6565×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6903×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Manhattan Community Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 18, 2025

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent the elopement of one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #9.On 9/08/25 a newly admitted respite resident with diagnoses of restlessness and agitation, dementia and senile degeneration of brain and history of exit seeking behaviors and falls was assisted to exit the facility by staff, was outside unsupervised for twenty-five (25) minutes until a staff member observed the resident lying on the ground next to the iron fence that encircled the facility premises, approximately three hundred seventy-five (375) feet from the facility entrance.The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Nov 5, 2021

    Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which provided sufficient water intake to provide adequate hydration for one (1) of (16) residents who require enteral feedings. Resident #2 On 9/04/21 the Registered Dietician (RD) #1 reviewed nutrition and hydration requirements for Resident #2 and made a recommendation to change the tube feeding orders for Resident #2. The Physician (MD #1) reviewed the recommendations and approved them and issued physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Therefore, the Care Plan was not developed to provide adequate hydration for Resident #2. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF692Nov 5, 2021

    Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received free water flushes through his Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube to maintain adequate hydration status which resulted in Resident #2 becoming Hypovolemic (Dehydrated), resulting in Resident #2 being transferred to the local hospital and admitted with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #2. On 9/04/21 the Registered Dietician (RD #1) reviewed nutrition and hydration requirements for Resident #2 and made a recommendation to change the tube feeding orders for Resident #2 which included 175 milliliter free water flushes every four (4) hours. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF693Nov 5, 2021

    Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received free water flushes through his Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube to maintain adequate hydration status which resulted in Resident #2 becoming Hypovolemic (Dehydrated), resulting in Resident #2 being transferred to the local hospital and admitted with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] .Resident #2. On 9/04/21 the Registered Dietician (RD #1) reviewed nutrition and hydration requirements for Resident #2 and made a recommendation to change the tube feeding orders for Resident #2 which included 175 milliliter free water flushes every four (4) hours. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 27, 2025

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention regarding one-on-one supervision for a severely cognitive impaired resident which resulted in an unsupervised fall, leading to an acute transverse fracture of the lower sacrum for one (1) of two (2) care plans reviewed for falls. Resident #1 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revised January 2023, revealed: Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life . A. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 78 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 20, 2026Standard6 findings
  • May 12, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 27, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2024Standard8 findings
  • May 16, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Jan 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2022Standard6 findings
  • May 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2021Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 13, 2021Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
  • Nov 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 23, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Aug 11, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jan 21, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Feb 27, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Feb 15, 2013—3 findings
  • Nov 17, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction