Deficiency Index

Majestic Care of Cedar Village.

Mason, Ohio · CCN 366120

27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
91
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
162
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MAJESTIC CARE
County
Warren
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 88 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 22, 2026

110 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.193.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover48.9%48.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$62,205 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2455.8%E1023.3%F716.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.3%
CMS’s current file: 43 of the 91 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Majestic Care of Cedar Village., in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 27, 2026

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided adequate supervision during incontinence care resulting in a fall from the bed. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #20 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #224 rolled the resident on her side and left the bedside to gather incontinence supplies. Resident #20 fell out of bed resulting in a laceration to her forehead and one broken toe. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 152.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscular dystrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and spinal stenosis. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 17, 2024

    Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infections for a pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual harm when Resident #20 ' s weekly skin assessments were not completed and subsequently led to hospitalization for a wound infection and possible osteomyelitis. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a discharge date to the hospital on 04/09/24, and as of 04/16/24 Resident #20 is still hospitalized . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF610May 17, 2023

    Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, review of facility documents and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse during an investigation and failed to conduct a thorough abuse investigation. This resulted in psychosocial harm for Resident #94 after the facility failed to protect and thoroughly investigate Resident #94's allegation of emotional and verbal abuse resulting in Resident #94 being afraid to leave her room, was agitated, and tearful. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admitted [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 21, 2023

    Based on record review, staff interviews, review of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of hospital records, review of facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide necessary supervision for Resident #108, who was assessed by the facility to be a moderate fall risk. Actual harm occurred on 12/03/22 when Resident #108 sustained an unwitnessed fall with injury. Facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision during the overnight hours, resulting in Resident #108 not being found on the floor until 12/04/22 (EMS arrived on 12/04/22 at 6:35 A.M.). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 14, 2022

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct thorough root cause analysis to identify potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls and falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when a resident experienced repeated falls resulting in fracture and closed head injury. This affected one (#104) of three residents reviewed for falls. Facility census was 160. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of [CONDITION(S)] with behavioral disturbance. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 91 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 22, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 23, 2026Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Sep 4, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Oct 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • May 17, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 14, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 5, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Feb 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard8 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 22, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 26, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard3 findings
  • May 17, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 16, 2014—2 findings
  • Sep 28, 2012—5 findings
  • Jun 10, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 1, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction