Madera Care Center
Madera, California · CCN 055191
28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 99
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 64
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS
- County
- Madera
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Mar 19, 2026
235 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.04 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 49.3% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $38,423 across 7 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2052.6% | E1436.8% | F410.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8032×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Madera Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF806Apr 13, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference were honored for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 49) when Resident 49 and her family told staff that Resident 49 disliked chopped foods. No food upgrade options were provided for Resident 49, despite informing the staff that she did not want tomatoes soup, yet she still received it on 4/12/23 during dinner. This failure resulted in Resident 49 decreased food intake with an unplanned 1.6-pound weight loss from 1/31/23 until 4/9/23 which further compromised Resident 49's nutritional and medical status. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 20, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There was a build-up of food crumbs and debris under the dishwasher, this had the potential for microorganism growth and to attract pests. 2. The ceiling had a patch that was not smooth and easily cleanable, this had the potential for build-up of dust and microorganism growth. These failures had the potential for microorganism growth that could be inadvertently transferred to food and to attract pests in the kitchen that prepared food for 47 out of 47 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 10:47 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Apr 13, 2023
Based on dietetic services observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian conducted effective oversight of the food and nutrition department in accordance with the facility's executed contract and professional standards of practice. These failures had the potential to result in ineffective and inadequate directing of the day-to-day Food and Nutrition operations to ensure the nutritional needs for 46 of 48 sampled residents were met in a safe and sanitary manner. (Cross reference: F692, F802, F803, F804, F805, F806 and F812) Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/10/23, beginning at 9:32 AM, observations and concurrent interviews were conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) regarding overall kitchen sanitation and cleanliness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Apr 13, 2023
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. One of the dietary staff and the Dietary Manager did not know the right location to check dish machine sanitizer. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 46 out of 48 sampled residents who received food from the kitchen. 2. One of the dietary staff and the Dietary Manager did not know the proper steps for washing dishes in two-compartment sinks. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 48 out of 50 sampled residents who received food from the kitchen. 3. The AM Cook did not follow pureed bread recipe for preparing pureed bread during lunch on 4/11/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 13, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. There was no air gap (a fixture that provides back-flow prevention. When installed and maintained properly, the air gap works to prevents drain water from backing up into the sink and possibly contaminating the area used for washing food) under the prep sink (sink used to preparation of foods). 2. There was brown, grey and black debris observed several places in the kitchen: exit door to hallway, on the insect lamp, two ventilator's fans inside milk refrigerator, the exit door to the dining hall, in the dry storage room's storage shelves and door, the air conditioning and heating unit next to hand washing sink, the window, fans,… […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 99 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 3, 2025Standard1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Feb 20, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
- Nov 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 13, 2023Standard and complaint19 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 7, 2020Standard8 findings
- Apr 5, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jun 1, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 3, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 9, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Nov 9, 2016Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 25, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2015Standard1 finding
- Apr 2, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 28, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 28, 2012—6 findings
- Dec 27, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction