Deficiency Index

Mabank Nursing Center

Mabank, Texas · CCN 676458

9 surveys since 2018. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
44
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2018–2026
’18’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
County
Kaufman
Medicare-certified since
2018

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 government-run facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

May 21, 2026

172 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.363.24
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover46.7%54.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$31,234 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K26.1%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2369.7%E721.2%F13.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 44 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F6992×

    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mabank Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF580Jul 30, 2024

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that was, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. 1. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #1's change in condition including head leaning heavily to the left, heavy incontinence, confusion, weakness, and need for 2-person assist on 7/15/24. 2. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Jul 30, 2024

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1.The facility failed to recognize Resident #1's head leaning heavily to the left, heavy incontinence, confusion, weakness, and need for 2-person assist on 07/15/24 as a change of condition. 2. The facility failed to ensure fluid intake was encouraged or increased for Resident #1 after receiving lab results on 7/18/24 which indicated Resident #1 was positive for a UTI. 3. The facility failed to follow-up for 2 days regarding Resident #1's lab results which were positive for UTI. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure all food items were labeled and dated in the Freezer #1, Refrigerator #2, Refrigerator #3, Refrigerator #5, Freezer #6, Freezer #7, Freezer #8, Refrigerator #9 and the pantry. 2. The facility failed to ensure the sugar was stored in a bin with a closed lid. 3. The facility failed to ensure the range hood was free of greasy droplets. 4. The facility failed to ensure all kitchen staff wore a hairnet appropriately. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689May 21, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 6 of 6 residents (Resident's #30, # 70, #81, #40, #58, and #6) reviewed for accidents.1.The facility failed to ensure CNA E and CNA B locked the mechanical lift during a transfer for Resident #30 on 05/19/26.2. The facility failed to ensure the mechanical lift was locked when transferring Resident #70.3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #81 had bilateral landing mats when in bed. 4.The facility did not ensure Alcohol Wipes was not stored in Residents #40 and #58's bathroom.5.The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not have bath wash left out in the bathroom sitting on the toilet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761May 21, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable for 4 of 22 residents (Resident #6, Resident #38, Resident #8, and Resident #90) and 2 of 10 medication carts (Hall 500 hall nurse's medication cart and the hall 400 nurse medication cart) observed for medication storage.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not have zinc oxide wound care cream in her bathroom left in the caddy by the sink.2. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 44 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 21, 2026Standard13 findings
  • Mar 12, 2025Standard11 findings
  • Jul 30, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 14, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Oct 30, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction