Deficiency Index

Lutheran Hillside Village

Peoria, Illinois · CCN 145768

28 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
91
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
107
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Peoria
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 16 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Illinois.

Last survey on record

Jun 17, 2026

145 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.404.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—
Annual nurse turnover40.2%39.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG17.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1178.6%E17.1%F17.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 91 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5771×

    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lutheran Hillside Village, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 17, 2026

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate nursing interventions related to life-sustaining treatment during a choking episode, failed to provide supervision during meals and failed to follow a physician's diet order; and failed to obtain a Negotiated Risk Assessment for one of three (R1) residents reviewed with swallowing difficulty and on special/modified diets who required supervision during meals. This failure resulted in R1 choking on a tater tot and ultimately expired. This past non-compliance, which involved R1, occurred from 4/15/26 to 5/12/26.Findings include:The Emergency Response policy revised 10/23/24 documents the goal of staff training is to enable employees to provide basic life support and/or first aid interventions. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 16, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly secure and use the correct sling during a mechanical transfer for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for mechanical transfers in a sample of four. These failures resulted in (R1) slipping through the slit/hole in the back of the sling and suffering a left [CONDITION(S)]. Findings include: Facility Event Reporting, revised 7-29-2021, documents Events involving a resident, visitor, or other person (non-employee) that are outside of usual or normal happenings and present a potential liability, and events that are not in keeping with standards, policies, procedures or practices and may have an adverse outcome will be documented. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Feb 23, 2022

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician ordered antihypertensive medication was correctly transcribed and ordered for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 receiving triple the dose of an antihypertensive medication at three different times. R1 became dizzy and hypotensive with altered level of consciousness. R1 required emergent transfer via ambulance to the local area hospital in which R1 received five doses of a reversal agent intravenously and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit on blood pressure support medication. Findings include: The facility's Receiving and Transcribing Orders Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF577Dec 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to place the facility's annual State Survey Results in a readily accessible location for residents for viewing. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 Residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 1/30/24 document: Policy Statement: Staff shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the (facility) community. These rights include the resident's right to: H. Be supported by the (facility) community in exercising their rights; M. Exercise rights not delegated to a legal representative; and W. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF758Jan 26, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for identified target behaviors and failed to ensure that identified target behaviors were an indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication for seven of seven residents (R3, R17, R23, R34, R35, R50, and R119) reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample of 32. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy, revision date 2/14/20, documents, Residents will not receive psychotropic medications unless behavioral programming and/or environmental changes or other non-pharmacological interventions have failed to sufficiently address the resident's target behavioral goals. […]

Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 91 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 17, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 13, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Jan 26, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Nov 16, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 10, 2021Standard3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Jan 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Nov 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 2, 2018Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 9, 2017Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 1, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Jan 25, 2016Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 23, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 20, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard13 findings
  • Oct 3, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 4, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 29, 2013—3 findings
  • Apr 6, 2012—4 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction