Lotus Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Orlando, Florida · CCN 105564
34 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 159
- Surveys
- 34
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 10
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- VENTURA SERVICES
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 150 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Florida.
Last survey on record
Jun 26, 2025
501 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.55 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.57 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.4% | 41.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $3,282 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2475.0% | E618.8% | F13.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lotus Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 26, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision and a safe environment to prevent a cognitively impaired, vulnerable resident from exiting the facility unsupervised for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1). On 7/22/22 at approximately 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM, the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility unsupervised. Resident #1 walked past the receptionist's desk and exited the facility's front doors when they opened automatically. He walked approximately 300 steps to the end of the driveway and then proceeded to walk across a 4 lane heavily trafficked divided highway. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF726Sep 16, 2021
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to prevent significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents who received [MEDICATION(S)] patch, (#1). On [DATE] at 1:41 PM, and 1:42 PM, the resident received 100 micrograms (MCG) of [MEDICATION(S)] instead of 50 MCG, double the prescribed dose. On [DATE] at approximately 12:00 PM, the resident fell from his wheelchair, and sustained a head injury with a laceration to his forehead. The resident was unresponsive with fixed pupils. He was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) where two patches of [MEDICATION(S)] were noted on his chest. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Sep 16, 2021
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a [MEDICATION(S)] patch was administered per physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On [DATE] at 1:41 PM, and 1:42 PM, the resident received 100 micrograms (MCG) of [MEDICATION(S)] instead of 50 MCG, double the prescribed dose. On [DATE] at approximately 12:00 PM, the resident fell from his wheelchair, and sustained a head injury with a laceration to his forehead. The resident was unresponsive with fixed pupils. He was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) where two patches of [MEDICATION(S)] were noted on his chest. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 3, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's nursing staff failed to adhere to standards of professional practice to promote skin integrity, obtain and implement appropriate wound care orders, and apply treatments and dressings as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#61 & #30). The facility's failure to implement adequate preventative interventions and follow policies and procedures for skin and wound care resulted in actual harm for resident #61, preventable injuries during activities of daily living (ADLs) care and development of a skin infection. Findings: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF660Oct 19, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for discharge to home with Home Health Care services as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 discharged residents, (#4, #8). Failure to implement an effective discharge plan for Home Health Care (HHC) services resulted in resident #4 and #8 not receiving required therapy services, Home Health Aide (HHA) services and Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to facilitate a smooth and safe transition from the facility to home. As a result, residents #4 and #8 experienced difficulties with daily routine, mobility, and excessive hardship for family members caring for the residents. Findings: 1. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 159 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 26, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2024Standard7 findings
- Jan 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2023Infection control1 finding
- Mar 3, 2023Standard and complaint19 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 26 earlier surveys
- Aug 26, 2022Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 16, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 21, 2021Standard3 findings
- Jan 9, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Sep 19, 2019Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jun 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 1, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jan 3, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Nov 3, 2018Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 16, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 1, 2018Standard8 findings
- Nov 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings · 8 harm
- Jul 18, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 27, 2016Standard11 findings
- Mar 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 21, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2014—8 findings
- Nov 9, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 20, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 16, 2012Standard10 findings
- Sep 21, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 26, 2012—2 findings
- Jan 27, 2012—4 findings
- Oct 20, 2011—18 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction