Little Sisters of the Poor
Chicago, Illinois · CCN 146185
12 surveys since 2018, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 36
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 76
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
- County
- Cook
- Medicare-certified since
- 2018
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 31 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Illinois.
Last survey on record
May 7, 2026
186 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.30 | 4.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.96 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.5% | 36.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,272 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G28.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1043.5% | E730.4% | F417.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7592×
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Little Sisters of the Poor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 1, 2025
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly transfer a resident (R1) using a mechanical lift during bedside care. This failure affected one resident (R1) causing R1 to sustain a fracture of the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal and pain in left hand fifth metatarsal. Findings include: R1 has a diagnosis which includes but are not limited to unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility and paralytic gait. R1 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 03/17/25 documents that R1 has a BIMS score of 08 which indicates that R1 has some cognitive impairments. R1's Initial/Final Report to the surveying state agency dated 01/15/25 at 8:05 am documents in part: Date, Time, location of Injury: 01/12/2025, 3:50 pm, Residents bedroom. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 29, 2024
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that (R1's) care plan was congruent with the fall risk assessment, failed to implement fall prevention interventions and failed to provide supervision to three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls. These failures resulted a laceration to the left lower leg from R1's 6/25/24 fall. These failures also resulted a laceration, abrasion, and bruises to the forehead, bridge of nose, and both arms along with a C1 fracture from R1's 7/13/24 fall. Findings include: 1.) The facility's fall incident log affirms R1 fell on [DATE] and 7/13/24. R1's (6/25/24) incident report states Unwitnessed Fall. Called to resident room by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 8, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement measures to supervise and maintain a safe environment to prevent falls for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) in the sample of 7 reviewed for falls and safety. This failure affected R1 and R2 who had an unwitnessed fall. The facility failure resulted in R1 sustaining a right forearm [MEDICATION(S)] fracture of the distal radius and ulna and right hip intertrochanteric fracture with varus deformity; and R2 sustaining a right femur fracture. Findings include: 1. R1's medical record face sheet documents the date of initial admission as [DATE]. On [DATE] R1 had an unwitnessed fall. The Facility Incident Report for R1 dated [DATE] at 3:16 am shows the following: R1 was found on the floor next to R1's bed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 7, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record the facility failed to follow their policy and discard food items that were labeled with a used by date. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents in the facility who eat meals from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/04/26 upon initial kitchen observation at 09:45 AM, walk-in cooler labeled #4 were observed with these items: corn beef with wrapper half open with use by date of 4/28/2026, and pepperoni (2) rolls with a used by date of 4/30/2026. The walk-in cooler labeled #3 were observed with bread with a used by date of 4/22/2026, (8) bags of Collard greens with a use by date of 4/30/2026, corn meal with used by date of 4/30/2026, seasoning oil with use by date of 4/10/2026, and cake mix with use by date 4/27/2026. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 7, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage practices as evidenced by a.) food not properly labeled, b.) food not properly stored, c.) equipment used for food preparation not properly sanitized, and d.) dishwasher temperatures not reaching at least 160 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash cycle. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 43 residents receiving food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:39 AM during initial kitchen tour with V7 (Dietary Manager), the following food items were found in the dairy walk-in cooler: 1. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 36 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 7, 2026Standard1 finding
- May 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 7, 2025Standard7 findings
- Aug 29, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 8, 2024Standard4 findings
- Jan 6, 2023Standard9 findings
- Dec 3, 2021Standard4 findings
- Oct 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Oct 9, 2020Standard1 finding
- Sep 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jan 31, 2018Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction