Lindsay Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation
Lindsay, California · CCN 555663
39 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 159
- Surveys
- 39
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Tulare
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.78 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.18 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.8% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2268.8% | E1031.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6932×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lindsay Gardens Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Jun 15, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when the residents experienced episodes of [CONDITION(S)] (increased blood sugar). These failures resulted in Resident 1 being hospitalized and Resident 2 having the potential for adverse side effects. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 3/29/21, at 4:30 PM, the PN indicated, Resident is noted to have increase heart rate of 129 (normal range 60-100), B/P (blood pressure) 122/85 (normal range is less than 120/80), SPO2 (oxygen saturation in the blood) @ 96% (normal range 95-100 %) in room air, temp (temperature) 97.4 (normal range 97-99). Her face is flushed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement and revise a comprehensive care plan (CP) for three of 33 sampled residents (Resident 61, Resident 81 and Resident 36). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 61, Resident 81, and Resident 36 having an unrecognized change in condition and adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/26 at 12:10 p.m. with Dietary Manager Assistant (DMA) in the kitchen, Resident 61's lunch meal plate contained a taco with a flour tortilla and ground pork, lettuce and tomatoes, a number (#) 12 scoop (1/3 cup) of beans and one slice of wheat bread. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Obtain a physician's order for two of six sampled residents (Resident 36 and Resident 84) prior to oxygen use. This failure had the potential for Resident 84 and Resident 36 to have serious health outcomes, including hypoxia (lack of oxygen) or oxygen toxicity (too much oxygen) causing lung damage and confusion. 2. Follow physician's orders for one of six sampled resident (Resident 84) when oxygen saturation levels were not monitored. This failure had the potential to result in missed early signs of low blood oxygen levels which could lead to potential organ damage, especially to the heart and brain. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/5/26 at 12:22 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Jan 8, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled to work in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven day per week. This failure had the potential to adversely affect resident care. Findings: During an interview on 1/7/26 at 8:58 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3 stated, there was an RN that worked on weekends, but was not sure if there was an RN scheduled to work on weekdays. During an interview on 1/7/26 at 9:03 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, LVN 5 stated there was an RN that worked weekends and the RN working on weekdays was the Director of Nursing (DON). During an interview on 1/7/26 at 9:10 a.m. with LVN 7, LVN 7 stated the facility had an RN who worked daily. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. The facility's 3-compartment procedure for manual dishwashing was followed by one of one sampled dietary aide (DA) 1 who washed one piece of foodservice equipment via the 3-compartment sink.2. One of five observed dietary employees (DA 2) washed their hands after a cross-contamination incident during the lunch tray line meal service for residents.These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of foodborne illness who received meals from the kitchen.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/26 at 11:25 a.m. with DA 1 in the kitchen, DA 1 was observed washing a large mixing food container in the first sink of the 3-compartment sink. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 159 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Standard12 findings
- Dec 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2024Standard5 findings
- Jan 3, 2023Infection control1 finding
Show the 31 earlier surveys
- Dec 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 10, 2021Standard10 findings
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 21, 2020Standard8 findings
- Jun 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 27, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 29, 2018Standard15 findings
- Jan 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jan 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 27, 2017Standard17 findings
- Mar 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 23, 2016Standard17 findings
- May 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 22, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Aug 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2015Standard7 findings
- Jun 26, 2014Standard8 findings
- Aug 6, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 13, 2013—7 findings
- Nov 6, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 27, 2012—9 findings
- Jul 21, 2011—4 findings
- May 10, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction