Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Red Bank

Chattanooga, Tennessee · CCN 445240

16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
82
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2024
’10’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
148
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Hamilton
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Tennessee.

Last survey on record

Jul 17, 2024

845 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.593.56
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.57—
Annual nurse turnover61.2%48.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,512 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG520.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1666.7%E—F312.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 82 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Red Bank, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 29, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, facility procedure review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #3) which resulted in actual Harm, of 5 residents reviewed for care plans for accidents. The facility was cited as past non-compliance and the facility is not required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-656. Non-compliance began on 9/26/2022 and ended on 8/28/2023. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Revisions, dated 3/2/2022, showed .Procedure .The facility should monitor the resident over time to help identify changes in the resident condition that may warrant an update to the person-centered plan of care. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 29, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, facility procedure review, medical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and interviews the facility failed to prevent falls with major injury for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility was cited as past non-compliance and the facility is not required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-689. Non-compliance began on 9/26/2022 and ended on 8/28/2023. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Management, dated 4/7/2022, showed .Accident .Refers to any unexpected or unintentional incident, which results or may result in injury or illness to a resident .Avoidable Accident .an accident occurred because the facility failed to .Evaluate/analyze the hazards and risks and… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF835Feb 29, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, review of facility documentation, and interview, the facility's Administration failed to provide effective oversight and follow the facility's corporate notification protocol for falls with major injury which resulted in actual Harm of Resident #3 of 5 residents reviewed for falls and had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. The facility was cited as past non-compliance and the facility is not required to submit a Plan of Correction for F-835. Non-compliance began on 9/26/2022 and ended on 8/28/2023. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 17, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure food items were stored properly in the kitchen and in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms and failed to ensure dishes and food preparation equipment were clean and sanitary which had the potential to affect 84 of 85 residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation and Food Safety, revised 9/8/2022, revealed .food is placed in a .sanitary .container .is labeled .with date .Associate food will not be stored with resident food .Opened packages of food are resealed tightly to prevent contamination of the food item . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 17, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 8 residents (Residents #34, #1,#43,#50,#21,#72,#66, and #587) of 85 residents reviewed for invasive devices. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 6/3/2024, revealed .The facility should use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as an additional .mitigation strategy for residents that meet the following criteria, during high-contact resident care activities .indwelling devices .examples include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes . […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 82 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 17, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Feb 29, 2024Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
  • Feb 1, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 20, 2021Standard7 findings
  • Sep 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2019Standard4 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 18, 2018Standard3 findings
  • May 17, 2017Standard13 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Jan 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 26, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 21, 2014Standard7 findings
  • May 21, 2013—11 findings
  • Sep 14, 2011—5 findings
  • Jul 27, 2011—2 findings
  • Aug 4, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction