Deficiency Index

Leominster Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Leominster, Massachusetts · CCN 225355

25 surveys since 2012, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
89
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
106
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EPHRAM LAHASKY
County
Worcester
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Nov 19, 2025

355 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.413.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover33.8%40.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$26,033 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3683.7%E511.6%F12.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 43 of the 89 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Leominster Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 2, 2024

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from physical abuse and mental anguish, when on 06/11/24 during the evening shift (3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M), Resident #1 refused to transfer to bed, he/she became combative with staff and in response, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 physically restrained Resident #1, to which Resident #1 said stop, you're hurting me! CNA #1 yelled at Resident #1 telling him/her he was the captain, and forced Resident #1 to transfer into bed against his/her will. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656May 23, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Activity of Daily Living Care Plan indicated he/she required the assistance of one to two staff members for ambulation, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her plan of care related to mobility and care needs. On 04/09/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3, left Resident #1 standing alone on a wet floor in his/her room while she went to get supplies to clean his/her floor. Resident #1 slipped, fell , and complained of left wrist pain and was later transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for further evaluation where he/she was diagnosed with a non-displaced left wrist fracture. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 23, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the assistance of one to two staff members for ambulation and whose Care Plan indicated he/she had a potential for falls related to impulsiveness, poor safety awareness, and weakness, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the appropriate level of assistance required to maintain his/her safety, while in the presence of an environmental risk factor (wet floor), in an effort to prevent incident/accidents resulting in injury. On 04/09/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 left Resident #1 standing alone on a wet floor in his/her room while she went to get supplies to clean his/her floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF909Jun 27, 2023

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inspect all resident beds annually for the [AGE] year, including mattresses, frames, and bedrails for possible areas of entrapment as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated August 2022, included: - Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks. - The Maintenance department provides a copy of inspections to the Administrator . Review of the facility's Center Bed Rail Assessment Tracking Log, undated, included no evidence that all resident beds, including mattresses, frames, and bedrails had been assessed for possible areas of entrapment in 2022. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 7, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Surveillance Program as required for the months of August, September, and October 2021. Findings include: Review of the Infection Surveillance Program log for 2021 showed no evidence of documentation for the months of August, September, or October 2021. During an interview on 10/07/21 at 12:58 P.M., the Administrator said there was no infection surveillance conducted or documented for the months of August, September, or October 2021.

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 89 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 19, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Jul 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Aug 29, 2024Complaint5 findings
  • Jul 2, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 14, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 27, 2023Standard13 findings
  • May 23, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Oct 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard10 findings
  • May 6, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2019Standard2 findings
  • May 3, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 27, 2015Standard7 findings
  • May 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 1, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction