Deficiency Index

Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Ennis

Ennis, Texas · CCN 676253

20 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
49
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
124
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Ellis
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

May 7, 2026

186 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.183.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover36.0%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ16.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD850.0%E743.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 49 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Ennis, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 17, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: The facility failed on [DATE] to ensure Resident #1 remained free of hazards and had adequate supervision in that she suffered a fall that resulted in a pool of blood around her head, a skin tear to her left elbow, and bruises on all extremities which lead to her subsequent hospitalization with 3 fractured ribs on the left (8th, 9th, and 10th rib). An immediate jeopardy existed from [DATE] - [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 9, 2021

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's refrigerator and freezer. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. These failures could place all residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings Included: Observation of the facility's refrigerator on [DATE] at 9:30 AM revealed: - 1 box dated [DATE] contained 18 cantaloupes with fuzzy white and black spots; and - 1 bag dated [DATE] contained 7 cabbages with fuzzy white and black spots; Observation of the facility's freezer on [DATE] at 9:55 AM… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677May 7, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 residents (Resident's #34, #61, and #64) out of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living received care and services for nail care. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #34, #61, and #64's fingernails were cleaned. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving adequate care and services to prevent infection, injury, and diminished quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 05/06/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy (a broad term for brain dysfunction caused by non-traumatic, systemic issues like chemical imbalances, organ failure, or infections,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Feb 27, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for four of four residents (Residents #12, #19, #58, and #171) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs and anti-pressure cushions for Residents #12, #19, #58, and #171 . These failures could place residents at risk for equipment that is in unsafe operating condition, which could cause injury. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/10/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jan 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all assistive devices were maintained and free of hazards for five (Residents #8, #28, #33, #35, and #47) of 18 residents reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs for Residents #8, #28, #33, #35, and #47. These failures could place residents at risk for equipment that is in unsafe operating condition, that could cause injury. Findings included: Review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/18/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of CVA (Stroke) and hemiplegia (partial weakness on same side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) effecting the nondominated side. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 49 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 7, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Feb 27, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jul 1, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 11, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Aug 17, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 1, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Jan 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Sep 9, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 17, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 13, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
  • May 12, 2016Standard6 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 4, 2015Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 24, 2012—1 finding
  • May 4, 2012—4 findings
  • May 19, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 19, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction