Ledgecrest Health Care Center
Kensington, Connecticut · CCN 075230
23 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 95
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- APPLE REHAB
- County
- Capitol
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 23 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Apr 20, 2026
203 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.41 | 3.84 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.79 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.7% | 43.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2678.8% | E39.1% | F13.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B26.1% | C13.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ledgecrest Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Jun 8, 2022
Based on review of the facility Infection Control program, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to designate one or more individual(s) as the Infection Preventionist (IP) on a full time basis. The findings include: Interview with the interim DNS on 6/7/22 at 10:30 AM identified the previous IP (RN #4) took the position of DNS on 1/16/22 until 4/10/22, when she then went out on a medical leave of absence. RN #4 had not returned to the role of DNS as of currently, but the Interim DNS (Corporate Nurse) identified she was returning by next week. Additionally, the Interim DNS identified the facility had not had an official IP RN since RN #4 left the role as an Infection Control RN in January 2022. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Apr 20, 2026
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #3, #15, #33) reviewed for the facility Water Management Plan, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Resident Care Plan that included a potential exposure to Legionella (a bacteria that causes Legionnaires Disease) and for the only sampled resident (Resident #47) reviewed for communication, the facility failed to develop a baseline Resident Care Plan identifying the need for a translator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jun 8, 2022
Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to revise the care plan to meet the needs of the resident. The findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/22/21 indicated Resident #17 required staff assistance with activities of daily living. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF660Jun 8, 2022
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of 3 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care with interventions to address the resident's discharge needs and failed to ensure application to community housing was completed in a complete and accurate manner. The findings included: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was cognitively intact and independent for most activities of daily living. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Aug 27, 2026
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering behaviors and elopement risk, the facility failed to adequately identify, assess, care plan, implement necessary interventions, and provide effective supervision and functional safety systems to prevent elopement for a resident with known cognitive impairment, wandering behaviors and fall risk. These failures resulted in Resident #1 eloping from the facility unsupervised and unrecognized by staff. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 95 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
- Nov 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jun 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 14, 2024Standard5 findings
- Jan 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Nov 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jul 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 8, 2022Standard9 findings
- May 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Sep 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 26, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 7, 2018Standard9 findings
- Aug 25, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 12, 2016Standard5 findings
- Nov 25, 2015Standard2 findings
- Dec 18, 2014Standard5 findings
- Mar 6, 2014Standard1 finding
- Apr 18, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 29, 2012—9 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 17, 2011—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction