Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Silver Spring, Maryland · CCN 215168
38 surveys since 2010, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 291
- Surveys
- 38
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 129
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
Jul 14, 2026
118 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.46 | 3.50 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.72 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.1% | 42.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $153,596 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
- Special focus
- SFF Candidate
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K11.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G21.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D7470.5% | E2120.0% | F76.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF678Sep 23, 2024
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to correctly identify the appropriate decision maker regarding health care decisions and that the resident/health care decision maker's wishes regarding CPR were clearly documented in the medical record to ensure CPR was performed if needed. This was evident for 4 out 51 Residents, (Resident #328, #30, # 97 #55), reviewed for advanced directives during a survey. The facility's failure to ensure that each resident had only one active MOLST, led to the determination that immediate jeopardy existed. The facility was notified of this determination on [DATE] at 6:25 PM. Surveyors accepted the facility's plan to remove the immediacy on [DATE] at 11:00PM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF583Jun 18, 2024
Based on medical record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide privacy to a vulnerable resident (resident #26). This was evident for 1 of 8 residents reviewed during a complaint survey and resulted in psychosocial harm to resident #26. The findings include: On 6/12/24 at 7:50 am, the surveyor received a facility reported incident (FRI) (MD00189048) that is associated with complaint MD00189537 which alleged a male facility housekeeper entered a facility shower room while a resident was bathing on 2/12/23. The resident was being assisted by another facility staff member at the time of the incident. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 18, 2024
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #29) of 27 residents reviewed for abuse. These identified concerns rose to the level of harm for both identified residents. The findings include: Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is a standardized test used to get a quick snapshot of the cognitive function and is a required screening tool used in nursing homes to assess cognition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 18, 2022
Based on the review of the facility ' s investigative documents, medical records, and interviews with, residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to keep a vulnerable resident (Resident #1) free from abuse by the resident ' s roommate (Resident #3). Resident #3 had a known history of physical aggression towards his/ her previous roommate (Resident #4). The failure of the facility to keep a resident safe and free from abuse resulted in physical harm to Resident #1, who was transferred to the hospital for treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Mar 12, 2021
Based on surveyor review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to clarify medication orders related to a diuretic and failed to notify the physician of elevated lab results for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during the complaint survey (Resident #2). The facility's failure to provide needed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice resulted in acute kidney failure, septic shock and eventual death of Resident #2. This finding was identified during the investigation of complaints# MD 281 and MD 795. The findings include: 1. On 03-11-21 at 10:41 AM, a review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the resident had a gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) for feeding and nutrition. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 291 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 14, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 18, 2026Standard and complaint15 findings
- Oct 9, 2025Complaint11 findings
- Sep 23, 2024Standard and complaint47 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 18, 2024Complaint24 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 18, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 4, 2020Complaint2 findings
Show the 30 earlier surveys
- Jan 14, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 27, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
- Feb 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Dec 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2018Standard and complaint16 findings
- Jun 8, 2018Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- May 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 30, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Sep 29, 2017Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Oct 14, 2016Standard and complaint24 findings
- Apr 5, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jan 12, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Nov 2, 2015Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2014Standard12 findings
- Oct 8, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 3, 2014—5 findings
- Nov 8, 2013—21 findings
- Jul 9, 2013—2 findings
- May 22, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 18, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 9, 2012—10 findings
- Jun 27, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 4, 2012—4 findings
- Sep 1, 2011—9 findings
- Dec 17, 2010—4 findings
- Oct 27, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction