Deficiency Index

Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Mount Laurel, New Jersey · CCN 315524

17 surveys since 2018. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2018–2026
’18’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
220
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
County
Burlington
Medicare-certified since
2017

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Jan 22, 2026

291 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.473.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover49.7%41.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$51,495 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.7%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2773.0%E513.5%F410.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 37 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF689Oct 16, 2024

    Part A: Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure their smoking policy interventions were implemented to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s) for residents who smoked tobacco and to ensure resident safety. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #144). On 10/9/24 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor entered Resident #144's room and smelled a cigarette-like smoke scent. The resident was observed lying in bed with the fan on and the window open. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the resident who stated they were not allowed to smoke in their room, but they had to wait for hours for the staff to come into the room to assist them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 22, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the facility's kitchen and 2 of 4 nursing unit pantries designated for resident food, and was evidenced by the following:On 1/14/26 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD) who explained the procedures for the dietary staff which included:-Staff must wash their hands at the designated handwashing sink.-Dented or compromised canned goods must be stored in a designated dented can area to be disposed of for credit.-Dishware, utensils, and equipment must be air dried and not wet… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF584Oct 16, 2024

    Complaint #: NJ177765; NJ177069 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified on 5 of 5 resident units (East, West, Central, North 1, and North 2) and was evidenced by the following: 1.) During the initial tour of the facility on 10/8/24 at 11:31 AM of the East Unit, the surveyor observed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER]-A: the air conditioner (AC) unit had unidentified black discolorations on the vent grill and the front of the AC unit had an accumulation of dust. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 16, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the facility's kitchen and 5 of 5 refrigerators designated for resident food, and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] from 9:30 AM to 10:45 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and observed the following: In the refrigerator identified as the Korean Refrigerator: 1. Two sealed bags of cooked rice with a use-by date of [DATE]. The FSD removed the two bags from refrigerator and discarded them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Oct 16, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff implemented facility policies and procedures to ensure a.) residents were provided with care and services to achieve their highest practical wellbeing, and b.) maintain the resident environment, equipment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for and 5 out of 5 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F584, F645, F657, F689, F758, and F812 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following: The Administrator's primary purpose is to direct the day-to-day functions of the center in… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 22, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2024Standard23 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 1, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jul 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Apr 28, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Dec 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 4, 2020Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • May 28, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jan 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 14, 2018Standard2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction