Deficiency Index

Lasell House

Newton, Massachusetts · CCN 225755

7 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
13
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2023
’11’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/7

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
44
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 7, 2023

1,159 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.944.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.66—
Annual nurse turnover34.5%34.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 13 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lasell House, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Sep 7, 2023

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment for 1 Resident (#19) from a total sample of 13 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was discharged from the facility on this date. The Discharge MDS indicated Section GG (functional goals) was not completed. The Discharge MDS also indicated it was not submitted to the Center for Medicare Services (CMS). During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 9/7/23 at 10:20 A.M., she said Resident #19's Discharge MDS (dated 4/28/23) section GG was not completed. The MDS Coordinator said the Discharge MDS was not submitted to CMS.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Sep 7, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record regarding the administration of medication for 1 Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 13 residents. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted in June 2023 with diagnoses including femur fracture, osteoarthritis, and depression. Review of Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of a possible 15, which indicated the Resident had moderately impaired cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Aug 31, 2022

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement weekly skin checks for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, with a revision date of 6/1/22 indicated the following under Practice Standards: Perform skin inspection on admission/readmission and weekly. Document on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Resident #23 was admitted in August of 2022 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 8/15/22 indicated Resident #23 scored a 13 out of 15, on the brief interview of mental status indicating he/she is cognitively intact. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Aug 31, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 12 residents, when a daily wound dressing was not removed for four days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, with a revision date of 6/1/22 indicated the following under Practice Standards: The implementation of an individual patient's skin integrity management occurs within the care delivery process. Staff continually observes and monitors patients for changes and implements revisions to the plan of care as needed, 3.4 perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressing for presence of complications or decline and document. Resident #23 was admitted in August of 2022 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Aug 31, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 12 residents. Findings include: Resident #23 was admitted in August of 2022 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 8/15/22 indicated Resident #23 scored a 13 out of 15, on the brief interview of mental status indicating he/she is cognitively intact. On 8/30/22 at 8:19 A.M., Resident #23 was observed sitting up in a chair in his/her room eating his/her breakfast. Resident #23's arm was uncovered, and a dressing was on his/her left forearm, initialed and dated 8/26/22. […]

Read all 13 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 7, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Aug 31, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Nov 27, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jan 24, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction