Landmark of Acadiana
Saint Martinville, Louisiana · CCN 195487
18 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 74
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE BEEBE FAMILY
- County
- St. Martin
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Feb 11, 2026
271 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.74 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.30 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.8% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1275.0% | E425.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Landmark of Acadiana, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Feb 11, 2026
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and/or follow physician's orders for 3 (Resident #82, Resident #11, Resident #13) out of 40 sampled residents as evidenced by:1.failing to implement the comprehensive plan of care for a floor mat when in bed for Resident #82;2.failing to develop a comprehensive plan of care for antipsychotic use for Resident #11; and3.failing to follow physician's orders for PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube water flush for Resident #13. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 11, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review; the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, by failing to ensure:1. Proper infection control techniques were practiced during catheter care for Resident #87; and2. Reusable equipment was sanitized prior to and after resident use.The facility census was 120.Findings: 1.Resident #87: Review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, with a last reviewed date of 01/2024, revealed in part, Purpose: to cleanse the perineum and to prevent irritation or infection. Review of Resident #87's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part, retention of urine, urinary tract infection, and overactive bladder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 15, 2025
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: 1. opened food items in the walk-in freezer, dry storage room, and reach-in cooler not labeled with the date and time; 2. expired food in the dry storage area; and 3. a thick layer of debris on the deep fryer cooking oil collection area. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 117 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Dec 13, 2023
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure every resident and/or their representatives had the opportunity to participate in quarterly meetings held for each resident's care planning process for 6 (# 38, #41, #75, # 27, #86, and #56) of 6 residents that were reviewed for participation in care planning, of a total survey sample of 43 residents in a facility with a census of 123 residents. Findings: Review of the provider's care plan policy revealed in part . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 16, 2022
Based on observation, review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food products that were stored in the dry storage room were dated when the package was opened this deficient practice has the potential to effect the 118 residents that eat meals in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Food Storage Labeling.find the food being stored, pick the storage area, document the date the food is being stored on the documentation label . On [DATE] at 8:40 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with S6DM (Dietary Manager). During the initial tour, observations were made in the dry storage room. A bottle of Oregano seasoning was observednon the shelf opened, without a date of when the bottle was opened. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 74 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 11, 2026Standard4 findings
- Jan 15, 2025Standard6 findings
- Dec 13, 2023Standard6 findings
- May 31, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Nov 16, 2022Standard3 findings
- Aug 26, 2021Standard2 findings
- Sep 18, 2019Standard2 findings
- Oct 18, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Apr 11, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 28, 2017Standard6 findings
- Oct 6, 2016Standard3 findings
- Nov 19, 2015Standard6 findings
- Dec 10, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 1, 2013—14 findings
- Dec 21, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 20, 2011—4 findings
- Mar 23, 2011—3 findings
- Oct 19, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction