Lakeside Special Care Center
Lakeside, California · CCN 555887
24 surveys since 2014, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 94
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE
- County
- San Diego
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 13, 2025
634 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.20 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.62 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.7% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D866.7% | E216.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B216.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F9122×
Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lakeside Special Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Feb 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse checked the meal trays for nine residents in Cottage Two during dining observation. This failure put residents at risk of receiving the incorrect diet based on their medical needs. Findings: On 2/10/25 at 12:08 P.M., a lunch observation was conducted. A Staff Member (SM) was observed pushing a cart from the hallway to the dining area, calling out, Appetizer is here .Appetizer is here! The SM parked the cart inside the dining room. Residents were seated in the dining room and a female resident left the dining area to call another residents. Nine residents were seated in the dining table and were served with the appetizer [cantaloupe] and drinks. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food stored and prepared in the kitchen was in accordance with standards of practice when food items were not labeled. In addition, the temperature log was incomplete, and there was an icicle build-up in the reach-in freezer. These failures could cause food-borne illness, and icicle build-up may affect the food's palatability and texture. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of food items inside the refrigerator were labeled. In addition, the temperature log was not completed, and the freezer was not maintained in a sanitary manner. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness and may affect the texture and palatability of food. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Aug 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on visitor check-in procedure when a staff employee allowed a non-staff employee enter the gate and left unsecured. This resulted in Resident 1 exiting the gate and eloped (a resident leaves the facility premises or a secured area without the knowledge, or supervision of the staff). This deficient practice threatened the safety and well-being of Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included Bipolar Disorder (a lifelong mental health condition that causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), current episode manic (a psychological state defined by a persistent spike in mood, high energy, and extreme activity that lasts for… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 13, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (Resident 14 and Resident 21) reviewed for antipsychotic (a class of drugs that treat symptoms of mental disorder by altering brain function) medication use had an approved indication. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of psychotropic medication. Findings: 1. Resident 21 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective (a mental health condition that may interfere with a resident's ability to think, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others) disorder per the Admission Record. A review of Resident 21's medical record was conducted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Feb 13, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was completed for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 99) when the licensed nurse (LN) did not document that the physician was notified of the resident's refusal for chest X-ray (CXR- an imaging test to create a picture of the structures in the chest, including the lungs, heart, and rib cage). As a result, Resident 99's medical record did not provide continuity of care between the care team. Findings: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), per the Admission Record. Per the same document, Resident 99 was transferred to the hospital on 12/22/24. A review of Resident 99's medical record was conducted. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 13, 2025Standard5 findings
- Feb 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2024Standard1 finding
- Dec 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2022Standard2 findings
- Feb 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Sep 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2019Standard18 findings
- Jun 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
- May 4, 2017Standard5 findings
- Dec 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 26, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 5, 2016Standard3 findings
- Apr 30, 2015Standard4 findings
- Aug 26, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2014Standard5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction