Lake Park of Madison Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce
Madison, Florida · CCN 105892
16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MAXIMUS HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Madison · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Oct 31, 2024
739 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.16 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.4% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D7100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Lake Park of Madison Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 31, 2021
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 vulnerable residents at risk for elopement (Resident #1) was not able to exit the building unsupervised via a window on 2/09/21. Additionally, on 3/29/21, the facility failed to ensure windows and all entry/exit doors were secured to prevent subsequent elopements for 1 of 2 current residents at risk for elopement (Residents #2). The facility's failure to prevent an elopement and eliminate potential hazards placed 2 residents at a likelihood of serious injury and death. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF867Mar 31, 2021
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies related to resident elopement that occurred on 2/09/21 (resident #1). The facility's failure to follow the QAPI process may prevent the facility from correcting and improving their systems to ensure resident safety and prevent serious harm for residents at risk for elopement (Resident #2). The facility's failure to prevent an elopement and eliminate potential hazards placed 2 (Residents #1 and #2) residents at a likelihood of serious injury and death. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Feb 25, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a functional resident call system on the entire East Wing of the facility. The findings include: On 2/22/21 beginning at approximately 11:20 AM, a tour of the 100, 200, and 300 hallways was conducted. These hallways were noted to have 53 residents with various levels of dependency. During the tour, residents and staff reported the call bell system for both resident rooms and resident bathrooms was not functional. Staff reported the situation had been ongoing for several months. Residents were observed to have actual bells in their rooms to use instead, however there were no bells or alternate call/alert system for resident bathrooms noted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Oct 31, 2024
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the shower rooms, soiled utility rooms, and laundry room (photographic evidence obtained). The findings include: A tour of the facility was conducted on 10/31/24 at 11:00 AM with the facility's Administrator and Maintenance Director. During this tour, the following areas of concern were identified: In the East Side Shower Room, 3 of 3 shower stalls were observed to have a large build-up of dark matter on the walls, grout lines, and floors. In the [NAME] Side Shower Room, 2 of 3 shower stalls were observed to have a large build-up of dark matter on the walls, grout lines, and floors. In the East Side Soiled Utility Room, 2 garbage cans were observed without lids. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Jul 20, 2023
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents sampled for nutrition. (Resident #54) The findings include: A review of Resident #54 electronic medical record revealed the following recorded weights: 2/1/23- 113.8 pounds (lbs.) 3/4/23- 111.6 lbs. 4/5/23- 106.0 lbs. 5/4/23-106.2 lbs. 6/4/23- 102.4 lbs. 7/5/23- 94.6 lbs. These weights indicate that Resident #54 had a weight loss of 16.9% of the resident's total body weight within a six month time frame. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 31, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jul 20, 2023Standard6 findings
- Mar 23, 2022Standard1 finding
- Mar 31, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 25, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
- May 10, 2018Standard1 finding
- Jul 1, 2016Standard3 findings
- May 21, 2015Standard6 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Nov 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 21, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Mar 13, 2014Standard3 findings
- Feb 1, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 20, 2012—9 findings
- Feb 17, 2011—6 findings
- Dec 16, 2010—1 finding
- Oct 25, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction