Deficiency Index

Lacombe Nursing Centre

Lacombe, Louisiana · CCN 195348

19 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
71
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
98
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
INSPIRED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
St. Tammany
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Jun 24, 2026

138 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.48
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover43.2%44.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1854.5%E927.3%F26.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B26.1%C26.1%
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 71 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lacombe Nursing Centre, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF800Sep 27, 2023

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain temperature logs in the kitchen for all meals to ensure food served was at a proper temperature range to prevent food borne illnesses. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 72 of the residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of facility's food temperature logs revealed the facility failed to record food temperatures on 09/20/2023 for breakfast, 09/22/2023 for lunch and supper, 09/23/2023 and 09/24/2023 for breakfast, lunch, and supper. Further review of the facility's food temperature logs revealed the facility failed to record milk temperatures on the following dates: 08/10/2023, 08/11/2023, 08/14/2023, 08/29/2023, 08/31/2023, and 09/01/2023 through 09/25/2023. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 27, 2023

    49343 Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure: 1. food was properly labelled and stored in the walk-in fridge and dry storage room, and 2. Proper food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness were followed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and storage revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 7. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Jun 24, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were within reach for 2 (#8 and #76) of 2 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Call Light, revealed the following, in part: Objective: Call-Light is to be placed within reach of resident when in the room at all times. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/19/2026 revealed she had a BIMS of 7, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jun 24, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior by failing to ensure:Halls A, B, and C ceiling tiles were maintained in good repair; andRoom BB was maintained safely, sanitarily, and in good repair.Findings: 1. On 06/22/2026 at 9:00 a.m., a tour of the facility was conducted with the following observations made: Hall A - There were multiple ceiling tiles with a brown and yellow discolored substance. The entrance of Hall A air conditioning vent located in close proximity to the nurses' station was observed to have active condensation with multiple black spots with yellow, brown, grey and black discoloration to the ceiling tile. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Jun 24, 2026

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents or resident representatives understood the arbitration agreement signed on admission for 3 (#11, #15, and #17) of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration.Findings:Resident #11Review of Resident #11's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #11's admission packet dated 06/03/2026 revealed an arbitration agreement signed by Resident #11's RP.An interview was conducted on 06/23/2026 at 10:12 a.m. with Resident #11's RP. She stated she recalled signing Resident #11's admission documents. She stated S7AC told her where to sign, but she was not educated on what an arbitration agreement was. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 71 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 24, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jul 30, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 21, 2024Standard7 findings
  • May 6, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Mar 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Aug 18, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Mar 11, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Mar 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 27, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 4, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 15, 2012—7 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction