La Paloma Healthcare Center
Oceanside, California · CCN 055335
37 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 93
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- San Diego
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 17, 2025
571 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.95 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.39 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.2% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2376.7% | E620.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8832×
Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at La Paloma Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall safety interventions for two of six residents (Resident 35 and Resident 23) reviewed for accidents were provided when: Resident 35's chair/bed silent alarm (an alarm used to help warn staff when a resident is changing position or getting up) was not implemented consistently; In addition, Resident 35's falls were not thoroughly investigated to ensure that all fall preventative measures were implemented. Resident 23's wheechair was placed in an area that was not within the resident's reach. In addition, the facility was not secured during the night when a visitor's entrance was left open and unlocked. As a result, Resident 35 fell eight times while at the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 18, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen environment and food handling processes were maintained in a sanitary manner in accordance with accepted standards of practice when:Dishware was stored wet, pitcher lids were cracked and broken, and grime was on the freezer doors and gasket.Cook 1 used a potentially contaminated glove to touch bread rolls. In addition, dietary staff did not take the final temperature of all food to be served during lunch.Dietary Aid (DA) 1 and DA 2 were not wearing beard guards while in the kitchen.Six bottles of grape supplemental protein 30 fluid ounces, three bags of renal tube feeding (formulated food delivered through a feeding tube) formula, and six bottles of carbohydrate-controlled tube feeding formula… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Jun 18, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to formulate an advance directive (a legal document that outlines your preferences for medical care and treatments if you become incapacitated and unable to communicate) for four out of seven sampled residents (Residents 8, 50, 86, and 92). This failure to communicate advance directive information could have resulted in care being provided that was inconsistent with the resident's expressed healthcare wishes.Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF757Jun 18, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents, (Resident 2) was free from unnecessary medication when the resident was administered oxycodone (a controlled pain medication) doses for severe pain five times in June 2026 when the resident's pain assessment indicated the resident had no pain or had minimal pain. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to develop side effects, tolerance and addiction.Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include toxic encephalopathy (disease that alters the brain function), right femur fracture and alcoholic cirrhosis. A review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report dated 6/15/26, indicated two orders for oxycodone: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Jul 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use pressure relieving mattresses as ordered for 4 of 9 residents sampled for pressure related injuries (24, 53, 66, 16). In addition, 1 resident (16) was not repositioned as ordered. As a result, there was the risk of skin breakdown. Findings: 1. Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Per Resident 24's physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Set mode at alternating, per weight or residents comfort . On 7/7/21 at 8:41 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 24. Resident 24 was lying on an LAL mattress, which was set to 140. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard15 findings
- Apr 17, 2025Standard4 findings
- Aug 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 13, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jul 9, 2021Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Mar 17, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 4, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Nov 12, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 26, 2019Standard12 findings
- Nov 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2018Standard3 findings
- Apr 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 26, 2016Standard7 findings
- Feb 1, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 23, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Mar 19, 2015Standard3 findings
- Mar 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2014Standard5 findings
- Feb 20, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 4, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 29, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 2, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 5, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 25, 2012—2 findings
- May 9, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 16, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 23, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction