Deficiency Index

Kershaw Health Karesh Long Term Care

Camden, South Carolina · CCN 425080

16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
38
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
132
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Kershaw
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.064.11
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.92—
Annual nurse turnover28.8%38.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$19,460 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ110.0%K—L—
Actual harmG110.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD770.0%E110.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 38 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7602×

    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5571×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • F6891×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Kershaw Health Karesh Long Term Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Jul 21, 2025

    Based on review of facility policies, resident records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1 was protected from a significant medication error. Specifically, R1 received multiple medications not prescribed to her: Metoprolol, Amiodarone, Digoxin, Eliquis, Fenofibrate, Furosemide, Loratadine and Potassium. This medication administration error resulted in R1 requiring hospitalization for further evaluation and monitoring. On 07/21/25 at 4:13 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations could cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.On 07/21/25 at 4:20 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Sep 25, 2023

    Amended 10/04/23 Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors did not occur for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident (R)1 received medications intended for another resident. As a result of this failure, R1's blood pressure started trending downward. R1 reported a headache and became increasingly lethargic. R1 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and stabilization. On 09/25/23 at 2:20 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 30, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date, label, and/or cover food products stored in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 122 of 126 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary Operations, dated 01/01/25, in the section titled Storage of Food and Supplies section five, revealed that: Staple, frozen, and refrigerated foods are stored with the new product to the back of older products. Foods removed from the original packaging will be labeled with the received date, either individually or as a unit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF881Jul 19, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a functional Antibiotic Stewardship Program that ensured criteria was met for the use of antibiotics for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotics in a sample of 29 residents (Resident (R)119). Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program revealed, . Frequency of meetings . monthly . Medical Director . sets standards for antibiotic prescribing practices for all healthcare providers prescribing antibiotics in the facility . Director of Nursing . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557Jun 11, 2026

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity for Resident (R)3. Specifically, R3's foley catheter bag was not covered, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Points To Remember In Respecting Dignity issued 08/16 revealed, . 20. Respect a resident's personal privacy, which includes the following: a. Own physical body b. His/her personal space/private space (i.e., room, bathroom) c. His/her personal care d. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 38 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • May 24, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jun 28, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 25, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Oct 24, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Feb 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction