Jonesboro Center for Nursing and Healing LLC
Jonesboro, Georgia · CCN 115545
13 surveys since 2009, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 129
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- EMPIRE CARE CENTERS
- County
- Clayton
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 70 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Georgia.
Last survey on record
Feb 12, 2026
270 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.33 | 3.38 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.24 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.8% | 51.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,801 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2191.3% | E— | F28.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Jonesboro Center for Nursing and Healing LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF582Feb 12, 2026
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) as required for three of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 160, R76, and R103) reviewed for beneficiary notices out of a sample of 50 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to financial burdens for residents, as they may have to pay out-of-pocket for care that is typically covered by Medicare.Findings include:Review of the facility provided policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices with a revision date of 11/23 indicated Policy:. It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 12, 2026
Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure tuna salad sandwiches were served at the proper temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food born illnesses affect 115 out of 119 residents. Findings included: During the second kitchen observation and interview on 02/11/26 from 11:58 AM to 12:42 PM, the following observations were made with the Dietary Manager (DM):A small steam table pan was observed on the counter at the left end of the steam table. The steam table pan contained eight tuna salad sandwiches, stacked one on top of one another, in stacks of two. At 12:09 PM the [NAME] stated the tuna salad sandwiches were the alternate menu item and were ready to be served to residents in the dining room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Feb 12, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Promoting/ Maintaining Resident Dignity, the facility failed to ensure staff dressed residents in daily clothing for one of one (Resident (R) 30) reviewed for dignity. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment for the resident and failed to respect the resident's autonomy to maintain their personal identity.Findings include:Review of the facility provided a policy titled, Promoting/ Maintaining Resident Dignity, with a revision date of 03/25 indicated Policy: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF637Feb 12, 2026
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the required timeframe when a resident experienced multiple areas of functional decline for one of five residents (Resident (R) 57) reviewed for resident assessments. This failure placed R57 at risk for further decline if care plan revisions and interventions addressing the resident's change in condition were delayed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, dated October 2025, revealed, an SCSA within 14 days of identifying a qualifying status change that affects more than one area and requires Interdisciplinary Team review and revision of the… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Feb 12, 2026
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the federally required timeframe for two of five residents (Resident (R) 4 and R144) reviewed for Resident Assessments. This failure had the potential to affect the accuracy and timeliness of federally required resident assessments. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, dated October 2025, documented the MDS transmission requirements of All assessments shall be transmitted to the designated [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] CMS System (iQlES) within 14 days of completion. 1. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 12, 2026Standard13 findings
- Mar 27, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
- Oct 26, 2023Standard7 findings
- Feb 17, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
- Dec 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jun 11, 2015Standard1 finding
- Nov 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2012—5 findings · 4 harm
- Jul 22, 2009—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction