Deficiency Index

John J Kane Regional Center-Sc

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · CCN 395617

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
88
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
311
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Allegheny
Medicare-certified since
1983

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 19 government-run facilities with 128 or more beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Jun 16, 2026

146 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.524.12
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover44.3%37.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG215.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD646.2%E215.4%F17.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B215.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 88 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6101×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at John J Kane Regional Center-Sc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 26, 2024

    Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, documentation provided by the facility, facility investigation, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by a left distal femur (thigh bone closest to the knee bone) fracture for one of three residents (Resident R91) and a head injury for one of three residents (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse- Resident last reviewed on 1/5/24, indicated that the facility treat every resident with respect and dignity. The failure of the facility to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm is identified as neglect. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 26, 2024

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance to prevent falls and an injury, resulting in actual harm of a leg fracture for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R91) and a head laceration for one of three residents (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy All Policy and Procedure: General Guidelines last reviewed on 1/5/24, indicated that the facility will provide necessary care and services to each resident to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Staff must properly position the resident [NAME] position of comfort during and after any procedure. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF567Sep 3, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, select facility policy, review of resident financial records, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to safeguard, manage, or accurately account for the resident's personal funds deposited with the facility for five of 38 residents sampled (Residents 21, R31, R246, R11, R46).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 2/1/26, with a previous review date of 11/24/25, indicated that upon written authorization of a resident, the facility must hold, safeguard, manage and account for personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility. Funds more than fifty dollars must be deposited in an interest-bearing account separate from the facility's operating account. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF568Sep 3, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, review of resident fund reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate quarterly resident trust fund (resident funds account with current accounts open and holding resident monies) statements for five of 38 residents (Residents R21, R31, R246, R11 and R46).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights, dated 2/1/26, with a previous review date of 11/24/25, indicated that the facility must establish and maintain a system that assures a full and complete and separate according to generally accepted accounting principles of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf and assure that a fully accounting of a resident's personal funds is given in writing to the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Jul 17, 2025

    Based on facility document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition on five of five nursing units (2A, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B).Review of facility submitted information dated 7/16/25, indicated that on 7/15/25, At 7:11pm, During a scheduled facility power outage, the maglock (electrified magnetic locking mechanism) door batteries became disengaged. While monitoring CCTV (closed-circuit television, a type of video surveillance system), Security saw resident enter the stairwell on unit 4A. Resident was identified as [Resident R1]. Security witnessed on camera her carefully safely walk down the stairwell and exit on unit 2A. Total Time 2 mins and 20 seconds. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 88 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 3, 2026Standard10 findings
  • Jun 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2024Standard5 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 28, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Oct 28, 2022Standard1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Oct 8, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Aug 8, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Jun 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 9, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Mar 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Jul 18, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Feb 11, 2014—3 findings
  • Aug 23, 2013—4 findings
  • Nov 26, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2012—5 findings
  • May 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction