Deficiency Index

John J Hainkel JR Home and Rehabilitation Center

New Orleans, Louisiana · CCN 195638

4 surveys since 2019, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
10
Surveys
4
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2019–2025
’19’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file2/4

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
142
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Orleans
Medicare-certified since
2018

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 3, 2025

585 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.404.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover37.6%45.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E233.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 10 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at John J Hainkel JR Home and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Apr 3, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment for 4 (Resident #4, Resident #22, Resident #46, Resident #64) of 34 (Resident #4 Resident #5, Resident #14, Resident #19, Resident #20, Resident #22, Resident #23, Resident #24, Resident #32, Resident #34, Resident #38, Resident #40, Resident #41, Resident #45, Resident #46, Resident #51, Resident #61, Resident #64, Resident #70, Resident #71, Resident #75, Resident #76, Resident #78, Resident #88, Resident #93, Resident #94, Resident #96, Resident #99, Resident #100, Resident #102, Resident #104, Resident #108, Resident #109, Resident #411) sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Apr 3, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. implement identified interventions for residents at risk for injuries related to falls (Resident #93, Resident #94); and, 2. ensure thin liquids were not accessible to a resident who required thickened liquids (Resident #22). This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #22, Resident #93, and Resident #94) of 5 (Resident #22, Resident #23, Resident #64, Resident #93, Resident #94) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Apr 3, 2025

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #71) with a new diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder was referred to the appropriate state agency for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled PASARR Preadmission Screening and Coordination with an effective date of 01/18/2018 revealed, in part, the preadmission screening and resident review process requires that all applicants to the Medicaid certified nursing facility are screened for possible serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 4, 2024

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a reportable incident of injury of unknown source was reported to the State Agency for 1 (Resident #34) of 5 (Resident #22, Resident #34, Resident #39, Resident #63 and Resident #76) sampled residents investigated for accidents. The facility failed to report Resident #34 had a displaced left femur fracture to the left hip without a known source of injury. Findings: Review of a policy and procedure titled, Abuse Components Plan/Elder Justice Act and Affordable Care Act, with a revision date of 10/24/2022 revealed, in part, applicable governing standards for the policy are 42 CFR 483.12 F609, Louisiana Department of Health Nursing Facilities - Licensing, Standards LAC 48:I. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF740Apr 4, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's behaviors were addressed for 1 (Resident #22) of 1(Resident #22) sampled residents investigated for behavioral healthcare needs. Findings: Review of Resident #22's clinical record revealed, in part, Resident #22 had diagnoses, which included unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #22's physician's progress note dated 03/28/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #22 was wandering around the facility and claimed she was missing things from her room. Further review revealed, Resident #22 indicated everybody thought she was crazy. Further review revealed, Resident #22 was mistrusting of all staff members and residents in the building. […]

Read all 10 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 3, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Apr 4, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Apr 20, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2019Standard2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction