Island Home Park Health and Rehab
Knoxville, Tennessee · CCN 445476
14 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 95
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Knox
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 20, 2026
173 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.37 | 3.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.1% | 48.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $21,715 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D8100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Island Home Park Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Apr 27, 2022
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for medication errors. Resident #1 received 7 medications that were prescribed for Resident #3. The medication error resulted in Resident #1 experiencing [CONDITION(S)] (low blood pressure) and being admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in the hospital, which constitutes Harm for Resident #1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550May 20, 2026
Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to dignity when an indwelling catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible to the public for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 3 residents observed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy Resident Rights, revised 2/2021, revealed .be treated with dignity . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Obstructive/Reflux Uropathy (Urine Blockage) and Personal History of Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate (Cancer). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645May 20, 2026
Based on Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screen was accurate after mental health diagnoses was identified for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #13 and #57) reviewed for PASRR.The findings include:Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1 dated 10/1/2025, revealed .facilities are responsible for accurately reflecting active diagnoses within the assessment process and ensuring coordination with PASRR requirements when residents have serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or related conditions .Review of the Level 1 PASRR for Resident #13 dated 8/29/2025, revealed .no… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 20, 2026
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene when serving residents' meal service for 3 residents (Residents #11, #23, and #101) on 1 of 4 units observed for meal tray distribution.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revealed All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures .Hand hygiene products shall be readily accessible .before and after eating .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Muscle Weakness, Dysphagia, and Anxiety.Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 scored a 15 on the Brief… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Mar 25, 2025
Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 1.19.1 review, medical record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 3 residents (Resident #33, #40, and #55) of 18 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual, dated 10/2024, revealed .Health-related Quality of Life .residents covered by Level II PASRR [Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review] process may require certain care and services provided by the nursing home .Steps for Assessment .Code .yes if PASRR Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness .Determination of Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk .Pressure ulcers/injuries occur when tissue is compressed between a bony… […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 20, 2026Standard3 findings
- Mar 25, 2025Standard3 findings
- Oct 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Apr 27, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 7, 2017Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jun 10, 2015Standard4 findings
- Dec 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Mar 11, 2014—1 finding
- Oct 24, 2012—12 findings
- Sep 7, 2011—1 finding
- May 6, 2011—7 findings · 4 harm
- Oct 28, 2010—2 findings
- Mar 24, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Elk River Health and Nursing Center of Ardmore, LLArdmore2 harm findings
- The Reserve at Spring HillSpring Hill1 harm finding
- Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation CenterSeviervilleno harm findings
- Elk River Health & Rehabilitation of FayettevilleFayettevilleno harm findings
- Woodcrest at BlakefordNashvilleno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction