Ignite Medical Resort Webster, LLC
Webster, Texas · CCN 676460
6 surveys since 2020, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 17
- Surveys
- 6
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2019
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 24, 2026
199 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 3.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.7% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G216.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D758.3% | E325.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ignite Medical Resort Webster, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF604Mar 22, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical restraints imposed for the purposes of convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for physical restraints. -The facility failed to ensure that physical restraints were not used on Resident #40 during medication administration via G- tube (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), which resulted in Resident #40 suffering from emotional distress and increased behaviors. On 03/17/23 at 12:35 PM and Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF742Mar 22, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #40) reviewed for behavioral services. - The facility failed to appropriately treat Resident #40's behaviors by staff restraining the resident during G-tube medication administration. This use of restraints resulted in the resident experiencing acute emotional distress. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Mar 22, 2023
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility for 5 of 5 residents (#16, #31, #17, #37, and #7) reviewed for resident rights, in that: -The facility failed to organize and allow Residents #16, #31, #17, #37, and #7 to participate in monthly resident council meeting. This failure could place residents who reside at the facility at risk of not being able to voice their concerns without staff being present, overhearing their concerns, and to conduct resident council meetings without interference. Findings included: Resident #16 Record review of the face sheet for Resident #16 dated 03/17/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Mar 22, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 2 of 8 residents (Resident #109, CR #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #109 received her full dose of medications by not leaving the medication at the resident's bedside. - The facility failed to ensure that the Kindle Medication Room did not contain expired IV medications. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications and/or adverse reactions to medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Mar 22, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which were complete and accurately documented for 8 of 15 residents (Resident # 40, Resident #7, Resident #10, Resident #24, Resident #29, Resident #31, Resident #54 and Resident #308 ) whose records were reviewed. - Nursing staff failed to properly document Resident #40's behaviors. - LVN A documented administration of Glucerna (a nutritional supplement) to Resident #40 on 03/15/23 even though it was not performed - The facility failed to ensure their system of documenting weights for residents was accurate. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 11, 2025Standard2 findings
- Mar 22, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 29, 2021Standard1 finding
- Sep 9, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 25, 2020Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction