Hubbard Care Center
Hubbard, Iowa · CCN 165335
9 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 12
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hardin · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 9, 2025
669 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.84 | 3.76 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 40.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $46,101 across 4 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D133.3% | E266.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hubbard Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Jan 9, 2025
Based on personnel record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent an employee from beginning employment prior to completion of their background check for 1 of 5 personnel records reviewed (Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide CNA). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: Review of Staff A's personnel file listed a start date of 5/28/24. The personnel included Staff A's Single Contact License & Background Check (SING) completed on 5/28/24 at 1:57 PM. The Time Card Report for Staff A dated 5/26/24 to 6/8/24 revealed they worked at the facility on 5/28/24 from 5:55 AM to 2:31 PM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jan 9, 2025
Based on interviews, electronic health records, and policy review, the facility failed to document accurate information in a timely manner. Interviews and record review revealed that the facility routinely saved documentation as drafts then altered the drafts before finalizing them into the record. During the week of the survey discovered 3 progress notes finalized from drafts with alterations made after the creation date to the finalized note for 3 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #12, #31 and #99). In addition, 1 resident had an initial fall assessment struck out with no fall assessment added for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Jan 9, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident 48-hours in advance that their Medicare Part A coverage would end and services would no longer be covered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admitted [DATE]. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact cognition. The Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification (BPN) form completed by the facility indicated Resident #50's skilled services started on 11/14/24 and ended on 11/19/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Nov 15, 2022
Based on clinical record review, guidance from the Resident Assessment Instrument manual and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately reflect the completion date on the Minimum Data Set assessments for three of three residents reviewed in the sample (Resident #32, Resident #33, Resident #37) for MDS accuracy. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Resident #32 had a quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/14/2022. The completion date (item Z0500) was documented as 8/28/2022. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 9, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 15, 2022Standard1 finding
- May 10, 2018Standard1 finding
- Mar 31, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 30, 2015Standard1 finding
- May 19, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 11, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 27, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Nov 10, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction