Hillsdale Hospital McGuire & Macritchie Long Term
Hillsdale, Michigan · CCN 235567
16 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 65
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 38
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hillsdale · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 31 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Dec 22, 2025
322 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.70 | 4.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.31 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.5% | 34.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G111.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D777.8% | E— | F111.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hillsdale Hospital McGuire & Macritchie Long Term, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 4, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the safety of resident during staff assisted transfer, 2.) implement care-planned interventions, and 3.) provide timely assessment and treatment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R3) reviewed for accidents, resulting in actual harm for R3's fall during staff assisted transfer with displaced right femur spiral fracture on 3/31/24, delay in assessment and treatment, pain, and transfer to the hospital for surgical repair of right femur and treatment for multiple pulmonary emboli. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 4, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 31 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased warewashing sanitization. Findings include: On 10/02/23 at 10:17 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Director of Food Service (Registered Dietician) I. The following items were noted: The Walk-In Freezer was observed with ice [NAME] protruding from the ceiling and side wall surfaces. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF887Aug 16, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records included education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and/or the refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine for four (Resident #6, #34, #184, and #186) of five reviewed, resulting in the potential for residents and/or resident representatives to not be fully informed of the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/19/22 revealed R6 was severely cognitively impaired. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 23, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow and implement infection control practices per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for two (Resident #2 and #5) of five reviewed for Infection Control/COVID-19, resulting in the potential for COVID-19 spread to all 27 facility residents and facility staff. Findings include: Review of documentation provided by the facility reflected four employees with positive COVID-19 test results, with one employee positive case on each of the following dates: 8/20/21, 8/30/21, 9/7/21 and 9/12/21. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF947Jun 30, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet education requirements for all Nurse Aides, resulting in Nurse Aides not receiving required in-servicing related to dementia management, with the potential for improper and/or inappropriate care for six facility residents with the diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] Review of (name of computerized) in-service training since January 2020 for three randomly selected Nurse Aides (E, F and G) revealed Nurse Aide E and G did not receive training specifically related to the care of residents with dementia. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 65 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 22, 2025Standard2 findings
- Oct 4, 2024Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 4, 2023Standard2 findings
- Aug 16, 2022Standard6 findings
- Sep 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jun 30, 2021Standard5 findings
- Nov 13, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 10, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Oct 30, 2018Standard7 findings
- Feb 27, 2018Standard4 findings
- May 24, 2017Standard7 findings
- Apr 8, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 16, 2015Standard3 findings
- Apr 24, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—7 findings
- Sep 14, 2012—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction