Highland Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
Houston, Texas · CCN 675493
31 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 116
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 10
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 27, 2025
500 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.65 | 3.21 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.21 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.9% | 44.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $40,186 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K211.1% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1161.1% | E422.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.6% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F7592×
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Highland Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF692Jun 27, 2025
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status in such as usual body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 8 (Resident #67) residents reviewed for weight loss. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #67 was monitored for weight loss resulting in a 14.5% or 24.8 pounds in a 3-month period. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 6/6/25. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF695Jun 27, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care and services, including oxygen administration was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for respiratory therapy in that:The facility failed to ensure Resident #43 received continuous oxygen and nebulizer treatments to meet her respiratory needs, resulting in Resident #43 experiencing oxygen saturations of 90 on 6/3/25 and 80 on 6/5/25. Resident #43 was experiencing anxiety and a change to her daily routine as a result. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Apr 24, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 6 (Resident #16) reviewed for pressure ulcers. -The facility failed to apply Resident #16's physician ordered pressure relieving heel protectors or to off-load his heels. This failure could place residents at risk for developing a pressure ulcer or worsening a pressure ulcer, which could cause pain and infection. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Apr 8, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 8 (Residents #9, #10, #19, #24, #33, #34, #35, and #37) out of 8 residents reviewed for ADL care. -The facility failed to provide scheduled showers three times a week to Residents #10, #19, #24, #33, and #37. -The facility failed to provide incontinence care to Residents #9, #33, #34, and #35 every 2 hrs and/or as needed. This failure could place residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, at risk of skin breakdown and infection. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Feb 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #5, Resident #61, and Resident # 67) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Residents #61, #5 and #67 received their scheduled showers. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs and ADL decline. Findings include: Resident #61 Record review of Resident #61's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 116 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 27, 2025Standard2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 10, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Apr 24, 2024Standard6 findings
- Apr 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 17, 2023Standard5 findings
- Nov 18, 2021Standard8 findings
- Sep 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2021Complaint4 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- May 11, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Jun 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2020Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 2, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 11, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 21, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 18, 2019Standard6 findings
- Jul 19, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 25, 2018Standard2 findings
- Mar 9, 2017Standard1 finding
- Apr 7, 2016Standard7 findings
- Jun 30, 2015Standard18 findings · 8 harm
- Oct 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jun 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2013—9 findings · 1 harm
- May 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 26, 2012—5 findings
- Jun 9, 2011—4 findings
- Mar 30, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- The Villages on MacArthurIrving2 harm findings
- West Janisch Health Care CenterHouston3 harm findings
- Elgin Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElgin2 harm findings
- Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston6 harm findings
- Corpus Christi Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCorpus Christi2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction