Deficiency Index

High Hope Care Center of Brenham

Brenham, Texas · CCN 676316

29 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
141
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
10
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy10

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
CHARLESTON HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Washington · rural
Medicare-certified since
2012

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 government-run facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.513.24
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover62.2%54.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$20,699 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.6%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD950.0%E633.3%F211.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 141 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F9142×

    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6791×

    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at High Hope Care Center of Brenham, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and once developed, failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] without a pressure ulcer to his right lateral calf did not develop a pressure ulcer. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and attractive and prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. 1. The test tray of the lunch meal included foods that were bland, unappealing, and inedible. 2. The facility failed to follow the recipe of the cabbage and did not include spices or prepare the dish as the recipe was written. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hungry, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 01/08/2025 at 10:21 AM reveled [NAME] L chopped heads of cabbage and boiled the chopped cabbage on the stove. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen observed for food storage, preparation, and distribution. 1. The facility failed to ensure the low-temperature dishwasher reached manufacture temperature settings for each cycle. 2. [NAME] L and Dietary Manger failed to perform hand hygiene when preparing food and performing tasks in kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for health complications, foodborne illnesses and decreased a quality of life. Findings include: Observation on 01/07/2025 at 11:25 AM revealed [NAME] L removed gloves and threw them away. [NAME] L put on new gloves without performing hand hygiene. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for three of eight residents (Resident # 9, Resident #19, and Resident # 37) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #9, Resident #19 and Resident #37's nails were cleaned on 03/24/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.Findings included:Resident #9Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 03/26/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Mar 26, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 2 (Residents #9, and #37) of 6 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #9, and Resident #37to meet their psycho-social and mental well-being for the months of January, February and March 2026.This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function. […]

Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 141 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Jan 10, 2025Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 30, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Oct 5, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 9, 2019Standard28 findings · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Jul 2, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
  • May 31, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 15, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 10, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jan 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Apr 26, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 11, 2015Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 2, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 28, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
  • May 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 16, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • May 22, 2014Standard18 findings
  • Dec 20, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2013—10 findings
  • Dec 9, 2011—5 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction